Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Dan Gonzalez vs. The World's Richest Man


Several pesky readers have taken me to task for not covering the latest news in the quixotic battle between Hogan & Hartson attorney Dan Gonzalez and Carlos Slim, The World's Richest Man ("TWRM"), previously reported on here.

TWRM is represented by local Yalie Angel Castillo, Jr. (by the way, Angel, this is a very good client to have).

Ok, you whiners, here you go:

''We can now move forward with our confirmation,'' said Daniel González, an attorney for Americatel who is with Hogan & Hartson in Miami. The rejection of the appeal by the court was final and could not be appealed, González said.

But Angel Castillo, a Miami attorney with Ogletree, Deakins who represents CTE, said the company had filed a constitutional challenge in El Salvador's Supreme Court, asking for ''protection'' against the lower court's decision. This is known as an amparo in Latin American law.

''CTE continues to assert that this is a domestic arbitration between two Salvadoran corporations, so that, in any event, rules of international arbitration do not apply,'' Castillo said.

''These are issues that are fairly new to the law of El Salvador so I think that the company will pursue all the legal remedies,'' Castillo said.

González said the Supreme Court appeal will not affect Americatel's efforts to proceed legally against any holdings of CTE's parent company, América Móvil, since the local court decision in El Salvador was final.

In Miami, Moreno originally ratified the judgment but later withdrew his order when he learned of the lawsuit by CTE in El Salvador. The decision by the Second Civil Chamber paves the way for Moreno to issue a new decision.

González said this should be the end of legal maneuvers against paying the judgment. ''They [CTE] have no order or any other basis to prevent the court in the United States from moving forward in the action to enforce our award,'' he said.

My question, in all such matters, is simply this: Who has the larger expense account?

23 comments:

Anonymous said...

That would be Dan.

Anonymous said...

Castillo got an LLM at Yale. That does not really qualify him as a Yalie. Anyone who has a JD (or the foreign equivelant) and is willing to pay can get an LLM from Yale, Harvard or Stanford. Basically, it is a way for tier-2 and below JD to buy their way into acedmia.

UVA Law Rules said...

6:57 - obviously, your ivy-league pedigree hasn't benefitted you as well as you hoped.

Don't let your popped-collar and sweater thrown over your shoulder blur your judgment -- in the end, that pedigree really does not matter.

Anonymous said...

I love it when ivy-leaguers denigrate each other!

Anonymous said...

Transfers don't count either. I wish HLS would stop taking transfers all together; it really hurts the brand.

Taking transfer students is for NYU/Georgetown.

Rumpole said...

Considering I believe I have cornered the market on having TWPCs (the world's poorest clients) it's nice to find out who the lawyer is on the other end of the spectrum.

Harvard-Law Transfer Student said...

9:30 - you are an idiot. "Transfers don't count" Getting into HLS is getting in to HLS. I transferred from a local school to HLS and I'm pretty sure I am every bit as smart as the next Harvard grad. Plus, I probably make 10 times as much as a Plaintiff's lawyer as the guy who graduated first in his class and is working at Weil Gotshal...

South Florida Lawyers said...

I always say, "you are not my best client, but you are my favorite one."

Anonymous said...

HLS transfer at 6:10:

You are not as smart as your HLS classmates based upon objective criteria (i.e., LSAT and undergrad performance (mostly LSAT)). That is fact.

You did well at UM your first year. That is great. But it does not qualify you IMO for HLS, and it certainly does not make you as smart as the HLS students who destroyed you on the LSAT.

Anyway, by your own admission, you have returned to your roots by becoming a bottom feeding plaintiff lawyer.

Did you even try to interview in NYC/DC with any major law firms? You know the ones where your classmates went for summers.

How about clerkship? Let me guess S.D. Fla, right? Again, that is great, but not really HLS material.

HLS Transfer said...

6:49-

You are a classic ivy-league, blue-blooded, ignorant idiot. I didnt do that well on the LSAT because I did not prepare for it, smart of not. But, after a solid 3.9 at UM, I went to Harvard, worked at a ivy-tower firm in LA for several years and hated the blue-blooded stiffs like you.

So now, I "bottom feed" by helping people hurt and scamed by the big corporations you represent. So, have fun working 80 hours a week, peaking out at $500K/year.

I'll continue to make millions, actually help people, see my children grow up and spend a little time surfing and fishing.

I truly feel bad for you. You have been so brain-washed and come to believe the shit that is fed to you by White&Case or Weil Gotshal cronies that you probably believe that you actually matter in this world simply because you went to HLS.

Grow up.

Anonymous said...

Can I point out that Dan went to UM?

HLS Transfer said...

UM is a great school and has produced some of the best lawyers in this town. Harley Tropin, Dean Colson, Abbey Kaplan, and the list goes on.

Go Canes.

Anonymous said...

Yeah...

HLS Transfer - while I am an UM grad and do agree that UM has produced great attorneys, I don't agree with your entire list...

True Crimson said...

HLS transfer:

It is kind of sad that you are still making excuses for your LSAT performance.

Are you also still rationalizing your SAT score?

BTW, you are wrong on how much Big Law "peaks" out at.

HLS said...

I am aware that Big Law equity shareholders can certainly make more. By and large (and generally in Miami), they do peak out around half a million. Even a producing partner at Hunton is hard-pressed to tip it over half a million, unless of course you are Marty Steinberg.

Even older top NY Firm non-equity partners pushing 2400 hours do not make much more than 600K.

But, it is all about lifestyle choices. There is nothing wrong with working at a big firm, so long as your blood does not turn too blue, like you Crimson.


And, I don't make excuses. I may be dumber than you, Crimson, but I'm sure I am happier and more satisfied. And my wife and kids are probably better looking that yours. And, my boat and car are both faster than yours.

true crimson said...

HLS Transfer:

I'm sorry. I didn't mean to upset you by bringing up that most at HLS look at transfers and LLMs with some disdain. You must have felt that before.

Anway, I'm sure you are very smart, a great lawyer, and very very happy.

Gotta run, I need to get back to this horrible brief by an associate who allegedly graduated from a top 20 school. I wonder if she was a transfer. Oh well, I’m going to ruin her Christmas for giving me this piece of dreck. (Just kidding.)

Anonymous said...

I agree with 7:19 and true crimson.

Transfers suck. I went to NYU (for all 3 years). And I hated all the transfers.

Anonymous said...

You "hated all the transfer"?

That is retarded. Did you mother not love you enough?

Anonymous said...

oh lets spend all day commenting to eachother yayyy get my jolies off

Anonymous said...

Need Florida Hard Money?

Princeton Capital Group lends residential and commercial hard money throughout the state of Florida.Florida Hard Money

Owen said...

That is very useful info. I may remark that Check my site because this is a site with extremely fine subjects to look at.
9

Phoebe said...

Well, I do not really imagine it is likely to have effect.

Anonymous said...

Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wished to
say that I have really loved surfing around your
weblog posts. In any case I'll be subscribing in your rss feed and I'm
hoping you write again very soon!

My blog post ... diets that work fast