
So let's see what happened yesterday in the new batch of opinions released by the 3d DCA, available to all appellate junkies here.
As usual, lots of "State v. Somebody" and "Somebody v. State" opinions. I'll leave the outrage/boredom to Rumpy and other criminal attorneys to sort out. Let's see, not much....
Oh, here's one: Olsten Health v. Cody.
Hmmm, personal injury trial appeal, having something to do with the meaning and import of a "fetid odor." That's enough for me, let's move on.....
Usual selection of PIP, divorce, and unemployment compensation rulings....
Hold on, what's this: Margules v. Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court of Florida?
I have no earthly idea what this could be about. I do see the 3d reversed and vacated.
Oh well, moving on: Miami Dade College v. Turnberry. Another lower judge reversed for apparent bias, ho hum, another day in paradise. In this case,
the judge’s expression of displeasure with the case, his extemporaneous exchange with counsel and prognostication in open court that the Petitioner would lose the property and afford Respondents a profit, were sufficient to instill the fear that Petitioner would not receive a fair and impartial trial.You think?
Saltponds vs. Walbridge. A deadly dull opinion interpreting statute of limitation provisions in the condo association context. Condo freaks can tackle that one.
Applica v. Newtech. I have no idea what the actual issue is in dispute, since Judge Shepherd didn't give us much (any) background. I guess you had to be there.
Anyway, for you hard-core contract wonks, here's the critical language:
It is inherent in business relationships that contracts are negotiated with incomplete information. Accordingly, where an agreement is unambiguous, as is the case here, we enforce the contract as written, no matter how disadvantageous the language might later prove to be.In other words -- take your pathetically awful contract and go home (or sue the lawyer who advised you to sign that crappy document).
Well, pretty slim pickings this week. Still, I hope you enjoyed our Thursday morning ramble, and we will see you next Thursday!
11 comments:
Excellent post, SFL!
Hey SFL it's been three days and the princess hasn't posted anything. Are you keeping her up late at night? Remember pal, it's work then PLAY.
6:57, my sentiments exactly
6:58, it must great 'playing' with the princess.
6:58, the princess was with me last night. SFL gets her on weekends only.
7:14, it is!
SFL must be really hurting. Some more salt:
Come baby, shake me, come baby, take me, I would be satisfied.
Come baby, hold me, come baby, help me, my arms are open wide.
I could be unraveling wherever I'm traveling, even to foreign shores.
But I will always be emotionally yours.
7:55,
I'm sure the princess will be more than willing to take away his hurt.
7:22,
I thought SFL has primary custody of he princess? If not, how thoughtful of you to lend her out to some of us.
typo- 'the' princess
6:57, agree
8:48, awful!
8:48, maybe SFL is getting a little old and can't keep up with the princess.
SFL adding even more salt to your Love Sick heart:
Come baby, find me, come baby, remind me of where I once begun
Come baby, show me, show me you know me, tell me you're the one
I could be learning, you could be yearning to see behind closed door
But I will always be emotionally yours.
Come baby, rock me, come baby, lock me into the shadows of your heart
Come baby, teach me, come baby reach me, let the music start
I could be dreaming but I keep believing you're the one I'm living for
And I will always be emotionally yours.
It's like my whole life never happened
When I see you, it's if I never had a thought
I know this dream, it might be crazy
But it's the only one I've got. Okay.
Come baby, shake me, come baby, take me, I would be satisfied
Come baby, hold me, come baby, help me, my arms are open wide
I could be unraveling wherever I'm traveling, even to foreign shores
But I will always be emotionally yours.
SFL, what do you think?
Post a Comment