Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Wes Parsons and the Logic of Trying Canker Cases


The DBR has a sympathetic article on Bobby Gilbert's ongoing efforts to hold the State accountable for destroying all of our citrus trees. In it, Bobby says these cases have been one of the greatest learning experiences of his career, and that it has mostly taken over his practice for the last year:

Over the past year, Gilbert said the case has taken over almost his entire practice and his free time. He expects the amount of time to lessen moving forward as colleagues including Nancy La Vista and others at Lytal Reiter Clark Fountain & Williams in West Palm Beach, Michael Pucillo with Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo in West Palm Beach, and Jamie Cole at Weiss Serota Helfman Pastoriza Cole & Boniske in Fort Lauderdale increase their involvement.

Gilbert and his colleagues have spent large amounts of money on the litigation, but he declined to comment how much they have paid out of pocket.

Gilbert and his team will get a piece of the Broward verdict, but he would not say how much the plaintiff lawyers would seek.

La Vista said the cases were taken on a contingency basis.

“If you don’t have contingency fee cases, then you’ll never be able to protect someone’s constitutional rights,” she said. “You’ll never have a day in court for someone that can’t afford a lawyer.”
So for us it is admirable that Bobby and his team keep up the fight, and we wish him well.

Meanwhile, the lead attorney for the State, Adorno attorney Wes Parsons, is getting paid $275 an hour to defend these cases to the death. But for Wes, this is a public service. Listen to his reasoning:

“Even if you were to start counting defense dollars versus tree payments, I don’t think it would work out to be cheaper to give money to plaintiffs counsel and their constituents than it is to pay lawyers to defend you,” Parsons said. “The people who will make money are the class members and the plaintiff counsel. That money is going to presumably come out of general revenue of the state of Florida at a time when it’s suffering budget cuts and doesn’t have enough money for schools or law enforcement.”
But it has plenty of money to pay Adorno to try multiple canker cases?

Apparently, for Wes, it makes more sense for the State to spend taxpayer money on private lawyers to work up and try canker cases over and over again. That, apparently, is economically more sensible than sitting at a table and working out a reasonable resolution so that affected consumers can receive real renumeration for their lost trees, and not some nonsense voucher at Wal-Mart.

And yes, the plaintiffs' lawyers who worked so hard on this should get paid, too, just like Wes.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Just because a plaintiff's lawyer files a complaint and prosecutes it does not mean that he and his client are entitled to something. Bobby Gilbert is a big boy; he knows what he's getting into when he files a class action.

Anonymous said...

It's that time again, to pour salt on SFL's love sick heart:


I love you more than ever, more than time and more than love,
I love you more than money and more than the stars above,
Love you more than madness, more than waves upon the sea,
Love you more than life itself, you mean that much to me.

Ever since you walked right in, the circle's been complete,
I've said goodbye to haunted rooms and faces in the street,
To the courtyard of the jester which is hidden from the sun,
I love you more than ever and I haven't yet begun.

You breathed on me and made my life a richer one to live,
When I was deep in poverty you taught me how to give,
Dried the tears up from my dreams and pulled me from the hole,
Quenched my thirst and satisfied the burning in my soul.

honest lawyer said...

Parsons -- “The people who will make money are the class members and the plaintiff counsel."

I read that this something Adorno has experience with.

South Florida Lawyers said...

8:38 -- going deep for that one, nicely done.

8:24 -- thanks for reading and for your comment. You are right. But I still think this is the type of case that can and should be settled for the public benefit, particularly now that we have a baseline for valuation purposes from that first trial.

Dylan-ranters-for-the-Princess-3 said...

8:47, agreed

Time for your daily medicine SFL:

Close your eyes, close the door,
You don't have to worry any more.
I'll be your baby tonight.

Shut the light, shut the shade,
You don't have to be afraid.
I'll be your baby tonight.

Well, that mockingbird's gonna sail away,
We're gonna forget it.
That big, fat moon is gonna shine like a spoon,
But we're gonna let it,
You won't regret it.

Kick your shoes off, do not fear,
Bring that bottle over here.
I'll be your baby tonight.

waiting-for-the-princess-to-post said...

Directed to Boyfriend of the Princess:
when are you going to introduce us attorneys to the Princess?

Anonymous said...

Great another Adorno lawyer feeding at the public trough. Didn't anybody get the message when Hank Adorno tried to sleaze the City of Miami and its fine residents. Now the State is paying Adorno $275 an hour to engage in a Stalingrad defense on an issue that was a politicial screw up from the get go. Give me a break. The judge should have ordered the parties to arbitration and created a fee risk. That would have knocked some sense into this absurd waste of public funds.