Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Now Here's How You Criticize A Federal Judge.

Noted conservative lawyer and NRO legal contributor Ed Whelan tears into the Chief Judge of the Northern District of California, Vaughn Walker (a Bush I appointee), who is about to begin trial on the same-sex marriage case brought by Ted Olsen and David Boies.

Let's see --

1. He calls it a "show trial."

2. He says Judge Walker just wants publicity and is seeking to convert the proceedings into a
"high-profile, culture-transforming, history-making, Scopes-style show trial of Proposition 8’s sponsors. Specifically, Walker is rushing to override longstanding prohibitions on televised coverage of federal trials so that he can authorize televised coverage of the Proposition 8 trial. Televised coverage would generate much greater publicity for ringmaster Walker’s circus."
3. He says Judge Walker "wants to stack the deck against Proposition 8" and "has resorted to procedural shenanigans and outright illegality."

4. He says Judge Walker's acts are "in plain violation" of the rules prohibiting broadcasting federal trials and the "obvious purpose" of Judge Walker's actions is to subvert those rules (even though Whelan concedes that Judge Walker may be in "technical compliance" with the relevant federal statute).

5. He calls Judge Walker's actions "kangaroo-court procedures."

6. Whelan says "
[o]nly an idiot or a hardened ideological advocate for same-sex marriage — and Walker is no idiot — would imagine that the Proposition 8 case is a good candidate for the program."

7. Whelan concludes that "
[i]f Judge Walker persists in failing to recognize that elementary fact, the national civics lesson that he will be providing is yet another reminder that too many of our federal judges willfully abuse their authority in order to advance their own political agendas."

8. For good measure, Whelan did a follow up post, lamenting that "[t]here’s no end to Judge Vaughn Walker’s shameless procedural shenanigans" and that "the only 'immediate need' is for Walker to disqualify himself for his patent lack of impartiality — or for some higher court to step in."

You know, just to be safe, I'm gonna take another long look at Judge Zloch's order.


Anonymous said... the guy's chief complaint is that a bunch of gay hating jerk offs will be able to spew their venom publicly, instead of behind closed doors? Wow.

Gotta love the criticism of the monkey trials too. Next he is going to criticize Brown and say that Plessy was the right decision all along.

I think any member of the judiciary, that belongs to this organization, should be ashamed of themselves. I used to belong to the NRA and refused to renew after that organization started taking ridiculous positions years ago.

Anonymous said...

If the trial is broadcast, the truth will emerge which is that the haters are close-minded bigots.

Anonymous said...

Where's Judge Zloch when you need him?

Anonymous said...

It looks like they will be broadcasting the trial,

Whelan Ups Ante said...

Anonymous said...

Question: Have any of Ed Whelan's scurrilous predictions about Harold Koh and Sharia law come true?

Search Engine Marketing said...

You really make it seem so easy with your presentation. I have gone through it's details and just enjoyed it. Thank you.

Anonymous said...

Wonderful post however , I was wondering if you could write a
litte more on this topic? I'd be very thankful if you could elaborate a little bit further. Thank you!

Feel free to visit my website the term online shopping pakistan is not a brand new concept in the contemporary pakistani market

Anonymous said...

What's up, just wanted to mention, I loved this blog post. It was practical. Keep on posting!

my webpage;

Anonymous said...

Hey there! Would you mind if I share your blog with my facebook
group? There's a lot of people that I think would really appreciate your content. Please let me know. Thank you

My web page;

Anonymous said...

Peculiar article, exactly what I wanted to find.

My site;