Thursday, March 25, 2010

"Cohabitators, Homosexuals or Fornicators"


No I'm not describing my circle of friends at Tuesday's terrific judicial reception honoring Judge Huck, but rather quoting from Virginia Governor Robert F. McDonnell's 1989 master's thesis, which denounced various degenerate activities that most of us would consider pretty standard here in sunny South Florida.

This NYT profile of him and Virginia AG Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II, who along with partner-in-crime Bill McCollum have launched the ND FL lawsuit seeking to have the health care bill declared unconstitutional, is pretty fascinating:

Outspoken and unwavering in his opposition to abortion and homosexuality and in support of property and gun rights, Mr. Cuccinelli is a purist among pragmatists. He stands out as a pugnacious culture warrior in a party more eager to court moderate and fiscal conservatives, and in a state whose governor hopes to portray himself as a consensus builder.

“Ken was a tea partier before there was a Tea Party,” said David B. Albo, a Republican delegate from Fairfax County and close friend of the attorney general. “I tend to take my job responsibility as doing what a majority of my constituents want me to do. Ken sees his job as setting a path and trying to explain to his constituents that this is the way we want to go.”

In recent weeks, though, some of Mr. Cuccinelli’s hard stands have become a headache for Governor McDonnell.

Last week, the governor was left to respond to questions about his attorney general after an audio clip surfaced on the Web in which Mr. Cuccinelli, in a recorded telephone conversation offered a legal strategy for testing the notion, popular among certain conservatives, that Mr. Obama was not born in the United States and therefore lacked eligibility to run for president. It was “possible,” Mr. Cuccinelli said, that a person could “challenge” a federal law as illegitimate because “someone qualified to be president didn’t sign it.”

Oy -- this is who you joined in with?

The DBR has a story today in which various legal scholars declare the suit to be more or less bunk:
Bruce Jacob, a Stetson University law professor who teaches constitutional law, said there is always a chance the conservative-leaning U.S. Supreme Court could side with McCollum. But he said arguments cited by McCollum make it sound “like they are grasping at straws.”

“It bothers me they are wasting the time of the country with this kind of lawsuit,’’ he said.

Barry Richard, a Greenberg Traurig shareholder in Tallahassee who was part of the team that represented George W. Bush in the 2000 presidential election recount, said he read the lawsuit and doesn’t think the high court will go along with it. “I don’t see any basis for the United States Supreme Court to say that Congress can’t do this,’’ he said. “This would severely emasculate the power of Congress.’’
See Bill, that's what you get for not hiring Barry!

BTW, you can sign a letter to Mr. McCollum asking him to dismiss his facacta suit here.

14 comments:

  1. As a pro-gun homosexual, all I can say to these pussy-assed bathroom wide-stancers is 'Make my day'.

    ReplyDelete
  2. SFL, there's always Iqbal!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Always a pleasure GW

    ReplyDelete
  4. Rumps' stole your post again, SFL How soon 'til he does a "health post?"

    ReplyDelete
  5. @10:53

    By combining bigotry with gun love, there is both an implicit and explicit threat being conveyed. And as any gay man can tell you, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

    ReplyDelete
  6. So health care is 1/6 of the entire US economy but does not impact interstate commerce? Absurd.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The issue is not whether this falls under the Commerce Clause, but whether Congress can compel an individual to engage in certain commercial activity. It's already well established that Congress can't compel a state to do something (although it can make disbursement of federal funds conditional). So why should it be allowed to compel an individual to purchase insurance? If so, what's the limit? Where do you draw the line?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Stetson? Stick with what you know. Just because you make great hats, does not mean you will make great lawyers

    NB: mcollum has issues

    ReplyDelete
  9. I swear the nly person more angry than me is the whacker

    That was an hilarious comment

    ReplyDelete
  10. The suit is utter horseshit. McCollum has major issues and would be disastrous as Governor. The whacker is the best part of this fuckin' crazy blog.

    ReplyDelete
  11. It's already well established that Congress can't compel a state to do something (although it can make disbursement of federal funds conditional).


    Auto Accidents Lawyer Temecula

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'm not the attorney here, but from what I gather; while the public relations campaign has called this an individual "mandate," the specific language within the bill is clear that this is a tax. Comply with the law by obtaining health insurance and you get a rebate on that tax.

    One thing we can all say with certainty is that the feds absolutely have the power to tax.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Free Truck Games Online. Cool Truck & Online. Start. of crazy and cool free truck games online especially games with monster. In Stunt Run you race various. PLAY FREE TRUCK DRIVING GAMES & TRUCK GAMES Play free truck. PLAY FREE TRUCK DRIVING GAMES & TRUCK GAMES. Over the rock is one of those monster truck driving games where. The best look and top truck of the year selection will be h. Monster Truck Toy & Games Forum Page 2. Page 2-HotWheels?, Models, RC, Video Games, etc. Use this control to limit the display of threads to those newer than the specified time frame.

    ReplyDelete