Wednesday, May 23, 2012

"Jury Deflates Penis Implant Claim!"

 Hmm, not a bad headline but we could probably do better:

"Lost Penis Leads to Lost Case!"

"Damaged Penis = No Damages!"

"Doc Escapes from Mangled Schmeckel!"

Come on people, help me out here -- there's gotta be more.

Actually, the anesthesiologist defendant may have put it best:
"The only cow to milk was me."
Note to Spence -- hard case (seriously, no pun intended!).  Clients were deported, this D was the last doc standing etc....

You did your best, this is why you became a lawyer, and now you move on and live to try another case.

Congrats to Jay Chimpoulis for a big victory for his client.


Anonymous said...

aronfeild is an unmitigated asshole. he cannot try a case. I recall that he brought his mommy and dadddy to court when Judge Gordon was attempting to hold him in contempt. he needs a brain implant, not a penis implant although he probably benefit from both!!

Anonymous said...

I know Spencer well. What I recall about that case is that after he got through the Judge Gordon contempt hearing he kept trying his case -- a soft tissue case -- and got a verdict in excess of $100,000.00. Many plaintiffs' attorneys would consider it a badge of honor to be held in contempt by Judge Gordon.

Anonymous said...

11:05 - shut up.

Anonymous said...

The priest in a small Irish village loved the cock and ten hens he kept in the hen house behind the church. But one Saturday night the cock went missing!

The priest knew that cock fights happened in the village so he started to question his parishioners. In church the next morning During Mass, he asked the congregation:

“Has anybody got a cock?”
All the men stood up.

No, no,” he said, “that wasn’t what I meant.

Has anybody seen a cock?”
All the women stood up.

“No, no,” he said, “that wasn’t what I meant.
Has anybody seen a cock that doesn’t belong to them?”

Half the women stood up.

No, no,” he said, “that wasn’t what I meant.
Has anybody seen MY cock?”

All the nuns, three altar boys, two priests and a goat stood up.

Anonymous said...

Takes one to know one 11:05.

Anonymous said...

This guy is such a massive douche. Jesus.

mikal said...

10:49, what's your problem? You post the same clap trap everytime someone says a kind word about Mr. Aronfeld. Do you just cut and paste your previous posts or is this an original thought?

Spencer is a good lawyer and he cares about his clients. He may not be your cup of tea, but at least he puts himself out there and doesn't hide behind a cloak of anonymity.

Anonymous said...

A 100k verdict? Wow...after paying a referral lawyer, he probably will only need 4 or 5 more of those huge 5-figure verdicts to make up for the costs he just lost (maybe lost?).

Anonymous said...

" Less than 30 minutes later, the jury delivered its verdict.

One juror said, "It was a two-minute discussion.""

Ooh, great case.

I do not think the doctor would think he is such a good guy:

"The attorney from the other side had to rewrite the rules that are there in the operating team. ... The other parties have settled down with the plaintiff and the only cow to milk was me because I was the only one that had insurance, under the circumstances, that can be taken for a ride and can be, you know, extorted some money out of it. Usually the insurance companies, they prefer to settle. And you know why? Because there is a three-year process. A process that damaged my family life, my personal life.""

Anonymous said...

Okay, the last two posts are a bit unfair - 1 no litigant likes the lawyer on the other side and 2, at least SA has the cajones to take a case to trial and lose. There are few attorneys around that are actually willing to try a case and he deserves credit for that.

Anonymous said...

Legislature started this with 768.81 & Supreme Court's interpretation of it in Fabre. Plaintiffs have to sue everyone they have good faith reason to believe might have played even a tiny part in causing the injury.
Legislature could fix this in 2 minutes by undoing Fabre and putting burden back on defendants to seek contribution from anyone they think might be partially responsible.

Anonymous said...

You Spencer haters are just jealous that he has the stones to go try a case and he can get publicity out of it. He ain't a paper pushing litigator.

Anonymous said...

"Never let the fear of striking out get in your way" (Babe Ruth, strike out king, home run king).

So SA struck out.

He's fearless.

Get over it.

Anonymous said...

Trys more cases than Hector Lombada.

Anonymous said...

spenser, stop posting anonymously

you are disliked because you are a self promoting douche.

and an annoying trial lawyer.

and a douche.

Anonymous said...

Glory lies in the attempt to reach one's goal and not in reaching it.
--Mahatma Gandhi

Spencer has attained glory no matter the outcome.

Anonymous said...

go to bed, spenser. stop referring to yourself in the third person, you douche

you lost.


Anonymous said...

he is a flaming self promoting asshole. I am glad he lost his ass in this case. He had to pay a so-called expert even to get this fiasco to the jury. he is a disgrace to all hard working plaintiff trial attorneys. somewhere in peru there is a guy with no money and no dick.

Anonymous said...

"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." T.R.

Anonymous said...

Powerful words, 9:11. A big motivational jolt on a rainy morning.

Anonymous said...

any time a jury takes a mere 30 minutes to reject your case, its time to think about another profession.

it means you have NO CREDIBILITY beforeajury.


30 minutes is , well, embarassing.

Anonymous said...

takes one to know one 11:09

Anonymous said...

11:09 has probably never seen the inside of a courtroom.

Anonymous said...

Actually 11:09 either can't read or is a bozo. Spencer's client got some bucks on this case because other defendants settled prior to trial.

Anonymous said...

I pау а quіck ѵisit ԁаilу some wеbѕitеs аnd websites
to read content, excеpt this blog provides quаlity bаsed pοsts.

Look аt mу blog - payday loans online
my web page > Payday Loans

Anonymous said...

buy ativan ativan withdrawal weight loss - ativan online prescription