The allegation is that LT committed perjury or, at a minimum, misled the Court by suggesting that the Tribe did not pay them to represent the defendants. Right?Now they argue that, by turning over checks showing that the Tribe did pay the defendants' legal bills, the Tribe somehow committed a fraud on the Court and against them and can't be heard to complain about allegedly tortious conduct during that representation?I'm confused.
2:37 - you got that right. Welcome to the wonderful world of lawyering.
More importantly the caf nut is back posting on David's blog.
This is a wonderful article, Given so much info in it, These type of articles keeps the users interest in the website, and keep on sharing more ... good luck.
Post a Comment