Thursday, February 14, 2013

So What Happens if You Allegedly Defame Someone While Defending a Defamation Action?



It's Valentine's Day, so of course let's discuss whether Levin Middlebrooks should be extended to an attorney's ex parte out of court interviews of potential third-party witnesses.

Should we use the usual absolute immunity analysis, or create a new qualified privilege to cover this particular circumstance?

Answers Justice Pariente:
We hold that Florida’s absolute privilege, as this Court has developed the common law doctrine, was never intended to sweep so broadly as to provide absolute immunity from liability to an attorney for alleged defamatory statements the attorney makes during ex-parte, out-of-court questioning of a potential, nonparty witness in the course of investigating a pending lawsuit. In this narrow scenario, we conclude that a qualified privilege instead should apply to ex-parte, out-of-court statements, so long as the alleged defamatory statements bear some relation to or connection with the subject of inquiry in the underlying lawsuit. A qualified privilege requires the plaintiff to establish express malice. However, where the statements do not bear some relation to or connection with the subject of inquiry in the underlying lawsuit, the defendant is not entitled to the benefit of any privilege—either absolute or qualified.
But Justice Lewis, in dissent, no likey:
I would not begin constructing qualified privileges (as the majority does here) and I would not superimpose the law of express malice into this area of the law. I would analyze the present case within our current legal framework and address whether the conduct is within the litigation privilege. Next, I would evaluate whether the alleged statements were inherently related to or connected with the underlying litigation.

Hey, I think Justice Lewis is on the right side of this one.

What say you?

In other news, the elusive butterfly himself, Richard Brodsky, has a new blog, Splendid Spitter, which contains an eclectic collection of erudite and well-informed opinions on a variety of interesting topics -- in other words, the exact opposite of this crappy space!

Good luck Richard (and keep after those auditing firms in the Miami Beach Community Health Center matter).

Oh, and a happy happy Valentine's Day -- enjoy the evening with someone you love.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Have A Happy Valentine's Day, SFL.

Anonymous said...

Canady nailed it.

Anonymous said...

glad i voted against the retention of these people.

Anonymous said...

The sixty day complimentary trial give is a wonderful
choice, in the case of the flex waistband.

Here is my blog post ... the flex belt review

Anonymous said...

Evеn though women are thе oneѕ most geneгallу impaсted by stretch marks, guys are
afflicted with them too.

Feel free to visit my ωebpage - Hushrat.Com

Anonymous said...

If you want to get a greatest electronic cigarette then you can pay
a visit to the store near at you or you can order it
on the web or you can get the very best electronic cigarette assessment from
web. Some groups have components that can be utilised for a
period of over six months. We are so busy these days, in a globe that much
more time is a necessity, that focusing on just one particular
point is really hard. Furthermore, V2cigs feature the mobility although in
the the large majority of burning bans. Some cartridges are refillable, but many aren't.

My web page: v2 cigs coupon october