You agree Daubert makes it more difficult to "attain justice"? I don't think so. It simply prevents an "expert" from presenting her "subjective belief and unsupported speculation" to the jury. Shouldn't that have always been the case?
I have no problem with Daubert and I'm usually in federal court anyway. But the Frye standard had its charms too -- are you saying it allowed too much bogus testimony? That hadn't been my (admittedly more limited) experience.
SFL -- I agree with him too, except for one thing: Hasn't Daubert been the law in Florida since July 2013? (If I'm mistaken I've been malpracticing (in case this message ever gets back to me, I'm joking)!).
To whom is that video directed? To an accident victim who he'd like to sign up? Doesn't that video (let's assume for the sake of argument he's right, which he's not) dissuade an accident victim from filing a lawsuit since they'll allegedly have a harder time attaining justice?
SFL is being charitable to Aronfart.
You mean Aronturd.
"Based solely on his opinion" says it all. Spencer, where did you get that jacket, who told you to wear it with that tie, and what's a "cude"?
Haters gonna' hate.
Opinions must be based on science. What a concept.
Spencer, Spencer when will you be mine?
I love Constance Frye!
I would hire him to do my wedding just to see what he would wear and say. I think he is happier marrying people than the people are getting married
I think he looks great.
Spencer has never handled a Daubert hearing...
Not true 6:16 PM he had one in front of Judge Altonaga last year.
Post a Comment