3d DCA Watch -- Glass Half Filled Edition

Hi kids, it's a cold rainy Wednesday but things are always warm and toasty inside the hermetically-sealed, temperature-controlled bunker.

Let's take a peek.....

Fernandez v. Haber & Ganguzza LLP:

What's the policy basis for the litigation privilege again?

Maybe it's time to revisit the doctrine in light of so many lawyers acting badly lately:
Although we do not agree with the actions taken by the Ganguzza law firm, we affirm because as a matter of law, the law firm is entitled to litigation immunity as to Fernandez’s tortious interference claim arising from the filing of the lis pendens in conjunction with pending litigation relating to the subject unit.
Yea! Saved by my law license!

There's more:
Although we believe that Ganguzza and his firm abused the legal process, we do not agree with Fernandez’s position......Although we think that the behavior of the Ganguzza law firm may have been highly unethical, we must affirm.
Got it, got it.

You keep saying things, but all I hear is that sweet sweet word -- "affirmed."


  1. Judge Porteous update


  2. You missed the most interesting case. A pca of a huge verdict against the tobacco companies.

  3. I saw it, but given it was a glorified PCA I wasn't sure what to do with it.

  4. Shumie sighted with keggy blonde at Loggia. He tipped big and drove away in his Porsche convertible.

  5. 7:02- the only thing I understood- Loggia, blonde, Porsche.

  6. Never heard of Gangguzza before and now never want to.

  7. Why didn't they sue the condo association for tortious interference and slander of title?

  8. hey short schwartz send the unethical lawyer to the bar like you usually do/ without any success because the bar knows that you are a mean, cranky old short man.

  9. Ganguzza used to be at Mike Hyman's firm. He left hooked up with a pos and then died.


Post a Comment