Skip to main content

3d DCA Watch -- Judge Schwartz Kicks Off the New Year With a Bang!



Our favorite Senior Judge had a big week to kick off 2011. 

Let's take a look:

Tahiti Beach v. Pfeffer:

Here the good judge just sits on the panel as Judge Salter, in his usual efficient and logical way, disposes of Andy Hall's appeal on behalf of swanky Tahiti Beach, which had imposed a $285k fine on a homeowner for not completing their construction or landscaping within 24 months.

The cretins!

Higginbotham v. Higginbotham:

Here Judge Schwartz reduces a spouse's $305k fee award as excessive, noting that the husband's counsel's fees were only $138k for pretty much doing the same work.

Miami-Dade County v. Eghbal:

Finally, here Judge Schwartz dissents from an affirmance of an age discrimination and retaliation claim against the County, saying there just was not enough evidence:
I do not believe the evidence is sufficient to demonstrate an indispensible element of a retaliation claim: that is, that the decision makers actually knew of the employee’s complaint so that their adverse action could have been causally related to that protected activity.....In this regard, it is undisputed that (a) Eghbal never told any of the three panel members, either specifically or impliedly, that he had made such a complaint and (b) two of the three stated, in unimpeached and uncontradicted testimony, that they were not aware of it.
Ok, but what about the third one?

Comments

  1. 100 years of judging

    ReplyDelete
  2. Never let a witness and a record stand in the way of an agenda!

    ReplyDelete
  3. What a horrible Judge. Judge Allen R. Shwartz took millions of dollars from my family and many others families involoved in a Monroe County investment and allocated that money to a bunch of scams. Without even thinking about the appelate brief, he just dissmised the case and gave the investment to people who were being forclosed upon. The defense called it usery, but it's sad becuase, the numbers are documented with absolutely no usery involved, and Judge Allen R. Shwartz didn't refer to the numbers. He didn't even give us our day in court. I think this Judge should have his bar revoked indefinately. My family has no more money and my father who worked his entire life to support our family is struggling to do so. It's because of Judge's like Allen R. Shwartz that make our Judicual system so skewed. This is based on my knowledge and opinion, so anyone reading this please don't send the police to my house like Judge Schwartz did when I called his chambers asking for a legitimate answer to this madness.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Kind of Federal Judge!

Sure we have Scott Rothstein and his lovely Tom James clothier Romina Sifuentes, but Louisiana has ED LA judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr.:
A federal judge from Louisiana who had run up big gambling debts routinely solicited money and gifts from lawyers with cases before his court, Congressional investigators said Tuesday as the House opened impeachment hearings in the judge’s case. The judge, G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Federal District Court, had more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos, investigators said. Judge Porteous’s requests for cash became so frequent that one New Orleans lawyer said he started trying to dodge the judge.“He began to use excuses that he needed it for tuition, he needed it for living expenses,” the lawyer, Robert Creely, told a House Judiciary Committee task force. “I would avoid him until I couldn’t avoid him anymore.”
Mr. Creely said he and his law partner, Jacob Amato, gave Judge Porteous an estimated $20,000 o…

Honoring Richard C. Seavey

I drank a shit-ton of bourbon last night. Enough to float a battleship.

My head hurts. But not as much as my heart.

We lost another lawyer over the weekend. Not someone who will receive facebook accolades and other public claims of friendship and statements that he shaped and changed lives and careers. Just a guy who did the best he could with what he had. Every day. And he did very, very well to be the best person he could be. 
Richard Seavey was a profoundly private person. In his 49 years, he walked through more than his share of trials and tribulations, mostly asking for no help, leaning on no one. 

Richard was a fantastic lawyer. He could try a case. He could "litigate" a case. He could mediate and settle a case. He was nuanced. He bent but never broke. The blustery Miami lawyer never scared him. To the contrary, he found humor in it, studying it like a science project. Richard never got too high or too low. He was good at lawyering, but you got the f…

First Carnival Triumph Lawsuit on File!

It was filed in the SD FL (of course) and is pending before Judge Graham.

Check it out here.

The lawyer on the pleading is Marcus R. Spagnoletti.