Score One for Alan Kluger!

As you know, we have been covering the case between Alan Kluger and Marc Randazza over an anonymous blogger and her dispute with a wealthy local developer.

Carlos Miller and Random Pixels have been writing about the controversy as well.

In the state court action before Judge Leesfield (there is also federal litigation before Judge King), Alan won a big victory for his client:  an expansive preliminary injunction order that purports to enjoin "defamatory" blogging, stalking and tortious interference.

Although the Court notes that she made no findings of fact and that a trial on the defamation claim will be held in the future, Judge Leesfield nonetheless ordered the defendant "not to enter defamatory blogs in the future."

Question -- how will the defendant know in advance whether a blog entry is possibly defamatory or not?

Over to you, 3d DCA!


  1. Not exactly "narrowly tailored"!

  2. It's called a prior restraint and vague to boot. This part of the order will be reversed.

  3. A "defamatory" trial will be held? Do tell. I think you meant a trial on "defamation" will be held.

  4. Your meaning was understood. Ignore the troll.

  5. How could a judge sign that order. What a joke. It makes no findings of fact?!?!?!?

  6. hmmmm... this is vaguely unsettling.

  7. when a judge asks both parties to send in dueling proposed order in Word you wind up with very broad orders

  8. 6:55 SFL took my good natured jibe as it was intended. Who here is the troll?

  9. Nine a.m. nailed it. A preliminary injunction restricting future allegedly defamatory speech. Without any findings of fact. Really? It makes sense, I guess, since adopting a proposed order is so much easier than writing one for her- or hisself. And if you don't care about being reversed, then I guess it's a gamble worth taking.

  10. Read the order
    Seems sustainable to me
    Enjoining bad conduct
    Seems like a good idea

  11. When I originally commented I clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get four emails with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove me from that service? Thanks!

    [url=]NFL Kids Jerseys[/url]

    [url=]Chicago Bears Jersey[/url]

  12. heers!
    Great post! Very informative.
    Thanks for possibility to write on your website,
    it's great!
    I’m still hoping there will be more posts on this site.
    Thanks a lot!

    employment lawyer ma


  13. Everything is very open with a clear clarification of the challenges. It was truly informative. Your website is extremely helpful. Thanks for sharing!

  14. Hi therе friends, good рost anԁ good urging cоmmented here, Ӏ am trulу еnjoying by thеse.

    Here is mу websіte - interracial lesbians

  15. Thank you а lot for sharing this with all pеoρle you really recognize what you're speaking about! Bookmarked. Please additionally talk over with my site =). We will have a hyperlink change agreement among us

    Feel free to surf to my web blog :: where to buy coffee pure cleanse

  16. I lоveԁ as much аѕ yοu wіll receive
    caггіeԁ οut right here.
    Thе sκеtсh iѕ tastеful,
    уour authοred subjеct matter stylish.
    nonethеlеss, you сommand get bought an ѕhakіness over thаt you ωish be deliѵering the fоllowing.

    unwell unquestionably come more fогmеrly again
    since еxactly the same nеarly a lot often insiԁe caѕe you shield
    this hikе.

    Ηеre is mу web-site; Cheap Car Insurance

  17. Its nоt my first time to ρау a visit this site, і
    аm brоwsing this web page dailly аnd
    οbtain niсe infοгmаtіon from heгe every ԁаy.

    Μy wеblog :: david wood empower network facebook


Post a Comment