Skip to main content

What Should Happen When You Blow Responding to Requests for Admissions?



We just covered what should happen when you fail to respond to a motion to dismiss (pray for appellate mercy), now how about requests for admissions?

I know what the rule says, but what if the admissions are those pesky "contention admissions" that basically ask you to admit every single disputed fact in your complaint?

Aren't those annoying?  Why do lawyers even serve them?

Even worse, the plaintiff filed a motion for sj based solely on the failure to respond to the admissions, even though the defendant had answered and denied the core allegations of the complaint?

Magistrate Judge Goodman says not so fast: 
But when a party propounds a request for admissions “with the wild‐eyed hope that the other side will fail to answer and therefore admit essential elements (that the party has already denied in its answer), the rule’s timesaving  function ceases; the rule instead becomes a weapon, dragging out the litigation and wasting valuable resources.” Perez, 297 F.3d at 1268.
This is so true.

Good ruling, Judge.

(My stab at an appropriate song title to accompany the ruling is above.)


Comments

  1. Requests for admissions? Hump day? Coincidence or conspiracy?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rules. What are they good for? Absolutely nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Tough to pin a song on this one but the closest I can come is "You Took Advantage of Me" sung by Rosemary Clooney If you get hit with a msj based on a request for admissions not being timely answered, I think the classy retort is to pour yourself a high ball, rev up the HI FI, put on your Don Draper persona, and sing along with George's aunt.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Kind of Federal Judge!

Sure we have Scott Rothstein and his lovely Tom James clothier Romina Sifuentes, but Louisiana has ED LA judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr.:
A federal judge from Louisiana who had run up big gambling debts routinely solicited money and gifts from lawyers with cases before his court, Congressional investigators said Tuesday as the House opened impeachment hearings in the judge’s case. The judge, G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Federal District Court, had more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos, investigators said. Judge Porteous’s requests for cash became so frequent that one New Orleans lawyer said he started trying to dodge the judge.“He began to use excuses that he needed it for tuition, he needed it for living expenses,” the lawyer, Robert Creely, told a House Judiciary Committee task force. “I would avoid him until I couldn’t avoid him anymore.”
Mr. Creely said he and his law partner, Jacob Amato, gave Judge Porteous an estimated $20,000 o…

Honoring Richard C. Seavey

I drank a shit-ton of bourbon last night. Enough to float a battleship.

My head hurts. But not as much as my heart.

We lost another lawyer over the weekend. Not someone who will receive facebook accolades and other public claims of friendship and statements that he shaped and changed lives and careers. Just a guy who did the best he could with what he had. Every day. And he did very, very well to be the best person he could be. 
Richard Seavey was a profoundly private person. In his 49 years, he walked through more than his share of trials and tribulations, mostly asking for no help, leaning on no one. 

Richard was a fantastic lawyer. He could try a case. He could "litigate" a case. He could mediate and settle a case. He was nuanced. He bent but never broke. The blustery Miami lawyer never scared him. To the contrary, he found humor in it, studying it like a science project. Richard never got too high or too low. He was good at lawyering, but you got the f…

First Carnival Triumph Lawsuit on File!

It was filed in the SD FL (of course) and is pending before Judge Graham.

Check it out here.

The lawyer on the pleading is Marcus R. Spagnoletti.