Skip to main content

Magistrate Judge Goodman Amends Order Finding Successor Liability Under FLSA!

Last Monday we wrote about an opinion by Magistrate Judge Goodman finding successor liability under FLSA in light of there being no clear 11th Circuit authority addressing the issue.

Despite a few folks cracking wise in the comments, it was perfectly clear that the Judge was not usurping the 11th Circuit, rather he was attempting to divine how the 11th might rule in the absence of binding 11th Circuit precedent.

As is his wont, however, Judge Goodman has decided to put a very fine point on the matter, clarifying in an amended order that -- heavens no -- he is not acting like the 11th Circuit -- he is just ruling as he thinks the 11th would rule if they were to ever address the issue:
The amendment makes clear that the Court’s ruling is based on a determination of how the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals would rule, given that there is no on point Eleventh Circuit opinion.
Ok, I mean I thought that was pretty obvious -- who thought otherwise?

Did this really need to be stated, or restated?
The parties have consented to full jurisdiction by the Undersigned magistrate judge, which means that the Undersigned is functioning as a district court and that any appeal of this Order is to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, not to the district court. Because the Eleventh Circuit has not decided the issue, the Undersigned’s task is to predict how the Eleventh Circuit would rule if presented with the identical issue of successor liability.
I guess it never hurts to clarify.


  1. Two comments:

    First, United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Not Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

    Second -- and this is just nitpicking now -- the judge's task is actually not to determine how the Eleventh Circuit would rule if it presented with the issue. That's akin to the standard used when a federal court tries to determine how a state's highest court would rule on a particular issue, when there is no definitive ruling from the state's highest court. Rather, the judge's task is simply, to quote a famous decision, "to say what the law is."

  2. Now he will amend again.....

  3. i dont amend- he sucked as a private attorney

  4. So, Goodman reads the comments to this blog.

  5. "I can see clearly now the rain is gone"


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Kind of Federal Judge!

Sure we have Scott Rothstein and his lovely Tom James clothier Romina Sifuentes, but Louisiana has ED LA judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr.:
A federal judge from Louisiana who had run up big gambling debts routinely solicited money and gifts from lawyers with cases before his court, Congressional investigators said Tuesday as the House opened impeachment hearings in the judge’s case. The judge, G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Federal District Court, had more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos, investigators said. Judge Porteous’s requests for cash became so frequent that one New Orleans lawyer said he started trying to dodge the judge.“He began to use excuses that he needed it for tuition, he needed it for living expenses,” the lawyer, Robert Creely, told a House Judiciary Committee task force. “I would avoid him until I couldn’t avoid him anymore.”
Mr. Creely said he and his law partner, Jacob Amato, gave Judge Porteous an estimated $20,000 o…

Honoring Richard C. Seavey

I drank a shit-ton of bourbon last night. Enough to float a battleship.

My head hurts. But not as much as my heart.

We lost another lawyer over the weekend. Not someone who will receive facebook accolades and other public claims of friendship and statements that he shaped and changed lives and careers. Just a guy who did the best he could with what he had. Every day. And he did very, very well to be the best person he could be. 
Richard Seavey was a profoundly private person. In his 49 years, he walked through more than his share of trials and tribulations, mostly asking for no help, leaning on no one. 

Richard was a fantastic lawyer. He could try a case. He could "litigate" a case. He could mediate and settle a case. He was nuanced. He bent but never broke. The blustery Miami lawyer never scared him. To the contrary, he found humor in it, studying it like a science project. Richard never got too high or too low. He was good at lawyering, but you got the f…

First Carnival Triumph Lawsuit on File!

It was filed in the SD FL (of course) and is pending before Judge Graham.

Check it out here.

The lawyer on the pleading is Marcus R. Spagnoletti.