Skip to main content

This Is How Banks Think.


In a sweeping affirmance of Judge King, the 11th Circuit addresses yet another arbitration clause in the checking overdraft context.

The twist, however, is that in this situation the arbitration provision was in a prior agreement that was entirely superseded by a subsequent agreement that did not contain any arbitration clause at all.

So how can the bank insist the old clause still applies?

Read on:
At this point, RBC reaches its last line of defense. RBC claims that even when parties supersede — rather than waive — a prior agreement containing an arbitration clause by forming a new agreement that is silent on arbitration, the prior agreement’s arbitration clause remains binding. In these situations, RBC contends that the arbitration clause can only be superseded if it is specifically eliminated by the superseding agreement. In other words, RBC claims that silence in a subsequent agreement is per se insufficient to eliminate an earlier agreement’s arbitration provision. This leads to the implausible conclusion that when parties indicate a clear intent to supersede a prior agreement, that superseding language applies to every term in the prior agreement except for arbitration provisions.
Does this even pass the blush test?

Comments

  1. Hey, maybe having a mandatory contract that strips you of your rights is a bad idea? But what do I know, I'm just a wacky Godwhacker?

    ReplyDelete
  2. If this were a criminal case, the 11th would have upbraided the lawyers for making such a "frivolous" "specious" argument.

    ReplyDelete
  3. MASIVE DENOUNCE PROYECT.

    WE NEED TO KNOW.

    SOME BODY SAYS SOME THING THEN ARE GUILTY.



    RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRQQpgiorg.blog.comQQQRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

    ReplyDelete
  4. PATENT DENOUNCE.

    REGISTER CORRUPTION.

    ASIAN COMISION PATENT.
    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE.
    EUROPEAN COMISION PATENT.

    QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQpgiorg.blog.comQQQQQQQQQQQQ

    ReplyDelete
  5. Pathetic. Good ruling too.

    ReplyDelete
  6. If the plaintiffs made this argument the 11th would have sanctioned them in a heartbeat.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Godwhacker, have you ever considered changing your name to godwhacker with a small g?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Kind of Federal Judge!

Sure we have Scott Rothstein and his lovely Tom James clothier Romina Sifuentes, but Louisiana has ED LA judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr.:
A federal judge from Louisiana who had run up big gambling debts routinely solicited money and gifts from lawyers with cases before his court, Congressional investigators said Tuesday as the House opened impeachment hearings in the judge’s case. The judge, G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Federal District Court, had more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos, investigators said. Judge Porteous’s requests for cash became so frequent that one New Orleans lawyer said he started trying to dodge the judge.“He began to use excuses that he needed it for tuition, he needed it for living expenses,” the lawyer, Robert Creely, told a House Judiciary Committee task force. “I would avoid him until I couldn’t avoid him anymore.”
Mr. Creely said he and his law partner, Jacob Amato, gave Judge Porteous an estimated $20,000 o…

Honoring Richard C. Seavey

I drank a shit-ton of bourbon last night. Enough to float a battleship.

My head hurts. But not as much as my heart.

We lost another lawyer over the weekend. Not someone who will receive facebook accolades and other public claims of friendship and statements that he shaped and changed lives and careers. Just a guy who did the best he could with what he had. Every day. And he did very, very well to be the best person he could be. 
Richard Seavey was a profoundly private person. In his 49 years, he walked through more than his share of trials and tribulations, mostly asking for no help, leaning on no one. 

Richard was a fantastic lawyer. He could try a case. He could "litigate" a case. He could mediate and settle a case. He was nuanced. He bent but never broke. The blustery Miami lawyer never scared him. To the contrary, he found humor in it, studying it like a science project. Richard never got too high or too low. He was good at lawyering, but you got the f…

First Carnival Triumph Lawsuit on File!

It was filed in the SD FL (of course) and is pending before Judge Graham.

Check it out here.

The lawyer on the pleading is Marcus R. Spagnoletti.