Skip to main content

11th Circuit to Judge Middlebrooks: I Refer You to Sam Drucker!



Well that's my takeaway anyway in this very interesting opinion dealing with whether Winn-Dixie ("Going Out of Business Since 1954!") can enforce restrictive covenants that bar other tenants from selling "groceries."

Judge Middlebrooks adopted a very narrow definition of the terms at issue:
For fifty-four stores, the district court reached the question of whether the Defendants violated the terms of the restrictive covenants, whose standard language for most stores limited the sale of “staple or fancy groceries” to a discrete “sales area.” Applying general principles of Florida law, the district court construed these terms narrowly, reading groceries as only food items and measuring sales area only by shelving space.
But the 11th reversed on this issue, holding there is no reason to define "staple or fancy groceries" so narrowly, and citing to a bunker opinion no less:
Regardless, Webster’s Second New International Dictionary, published first in 1934, also defined groceries to allow non-food items: a grocer is “a dealer in tea, sugar, spices, coffee, fruits, and various other commodities, chiefly foodstuffs.” Webster’s Second New International Dictionary 1105 (1958) (emphasis added). Indeed, a review of other dictionaries reveals no evidence of a contrary or changing definition. See, e.g., Oxford English Dictionary 862 (2d ed. 1991) (groceries are “goods sold by a grocer;” a grocer is “[a] trader who deals in spices, dried fruits, sugar, and, in general, all articles of domestic consumption except those that are considered the distinctive wares of some other class of tradesmen” (emphasis added)); Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary 502 (1979) (“groceries” are “commodities sold by a grocer”; a “grocer” is “a dealer in staple foodstuffs, household supplies, and usually meats, produce, and dairy products” (emphasis added)).
Exactly!

Also, a good grocer is a friend to Arnold the Pig.


(I added that last part.)

Comments

  1. "Dahliniluvyabutgimmeparkavenue"

    ReplyDelete
  2. Who associates Winn-Dixie with "fancy groceries"? Whole Foods, The Fresh Market, and Trader Joe's (the beloved newcomer to South Florida) for sure; but . . . Winn-Dixie?!??

    Winn-Dixie: They're the "What's your legal beef?" people!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I just adore a penthouse view, darling I love you but give me Park Avenue.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I learned most of what I know about law from Greenacres which I watched while growing up.

    And I was local president of the Kendall Greenacres Fan club. We met at Don Carter's Bowling Lanes the third Tuesday of every month at 6:30 pm.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Is Ziffel one "f" or two?

    ReplyDelete
  6. The way your mind works is amazing...and scary.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @334 pm : I totally agree . What a sex life he must have

    ReplyDelete
  8. Tearful reunion in the U.S.A
    Day by day those memories fade away
    Some babies grow in a peculiar way
    It changed, it grew, and everybody knew

    Semi-mojo, who's this kinky so-and-so?

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Kind of Federal Judge!

Sure we have Scott Rothstein and his lovely Tom James clothier Romina Sifuentes, but Louisiana has ED LA judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr.:
A federal judge from Louisiana who had run up big gambling debts routinely solicited money and gifts from lawyers with cases before his court, Congressional investigators said Tuesday as the House opened impeachment hearings in the judge’s case. The judge, G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Federal District Court, had more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos, investigators said. Judge Porteous’s requests for cash became so frequent that one New Orleans lawyer said he started trying to dodge the judge.“He began to use excuses that he needed it for tuition, he needed it for living expenses,” the lawyer, Robert Creely, told a House Judiciary Committee task force. “I would avoid him until I couldn’t avoid him anymore.”
Mr. Creely said he and his law partner, Jacob Amato, gave Judge Porteous an estimated $20,000 o…

Honoring Richard C. Seavey

I drank a shit-ton of bourbon last night. Enough to float a battleship.

My head hurts. But not as much as my heart.

We lost another lawyer over the weekend. Not someone who will receive facebook accolades and other public claims of friendship and statements that he shaped and changed lives and careers. Just a guy who did the best he could with what he had. Every day. And he did very, very well to be the best person he could be. 
Richard Seavey was a profoundly private person. In his 49 years, he walked through more than his share of trials and tribulations, mostly asking for no help, leaning on no one. 

Richard was a fantastic lawyer. He could try a case. He could "litigate" a case. He could mediate and settle a case. He was nuanced. He bent but never broke. The blustery Miami lawyer never scared him. To the contrary, he found humor in it, studying it like a science project. Richard never got too high or too low. He was good at lawyering, but you got the f…

First Carnival Triumph Lawsuit on File!

It was filed in the SD FL (of course) and is pending before Judge Graham.

Check it out here.

The lawyer on the pleading is Marcus R. Spagnoletti.