Skip to main content

3d DCA Watch -- Life is a Coin Flip Edition!


Hi kids, it's that time again, where the Bunker Hill Gang issues forth important pronouncements from their heavily fortified concrete enclosure, all while looking absolutely fabulous doing it!

Let's peek in:

OJ McDuffie v. Uribe:

This high-profile case lingers on:
The appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied without prejudice to raise the issue of prejudgment interest should an appeal be taken from the retrial of this matter.
So we will be seeing this one (yet) again.

Pages v. Seliman:

This is your typical South Florida parking experience, involving inexplicable, violent road rage and a defense to the subsequent civil suit based on Florida's Stand Your Ground law:
Following an evidentiary hearing, the magistrate issued a detailed fourteen page report and recommendation with factual findings, credibility assessments, and a conclusion that Tapia established by a preponderance of that evidence that he “had a reasonable fear for the safety of his wife, Ms. Singer, given Dr. Pages’ immediate and continuing aggressive behavior and, based on this reasonable fear, [Tapia] rushed over and pushed Dr. Pages hard to keep him from coming closer to his wife, Ms. Singer.”7 Thus, because a determination was made that Tapia reasonably believed he had to act to defend against Pages’ imminent use of “unlawful force” upon Tapia’s wife, Tapia was justified in the use of non-deadly force under section 776.012, rendering unnecessary any further discussion of the alternative provisions or requirements of section 776.013(3).
And all just to get a pineapple Froyo!

Courtney v. Edwards:

This is an interesting order by Judge Wells.

And Judge Bailey is right:  Henry Courtney is a "fine lawyer."

To deprive him of a modest fee for his early work in a case, after it settled following a $19 million jury verdict, seems wrong.

And to do so based on the oft-stated yet never analyzed or empirically validated presumption that a more "aggressive" lawyer is a "better" lawyer seems doubly wrong:
We quash the order in part because a client’s desire to hire a more aggressive lawyer with greater “expertise” than the lawyer initially hired does not deprive the initially discharged attorney of entitlement to be paid for his or her work. This would make charging liens all but superfluous.
Seems fundamental, no?

Or am I missing something?

Comments

  1. I thought Bailey was smarter than to deny an attorneys lien fee. Guess not. Very basic.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Kind of Federal Judge!

Sure we have Scott Rothstein and his lovely Tom James clothier Romina Sifuentes, but Louisiana has ED LA judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr.:
A federal judge from Louisiana who had run up big gambling debts routinely solicited money and gifts from lawyers with cases before his court, Congressional investigators said Tuesday as the House opened impeachment hearings in the judge’s case. The judge, G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Federal District Court, had more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos, investigators said. Judge Porteous’s requests for cash became so frequent that one New Orleans lawyer said he started trying to dodge the judge.“He began to use excuses that he needed it for tuition, he needed it for living expenses,” the lawyer, Robert Creely, told a House Judiciary Committee task force. “I would avoid him until I couldn’t avoid him anymore.”
Mr. Creely said he and his law partner, Jacob Amato, gave Judge Porteous an estimated $20,000 o…

Honoring Richard C. Seavey

I drank a shit-ton of bourbon last night. Enough to float a battleship.

My head hurts. But not as much as my heart.

We lost another lawyer over the weekend. Not someone who will receive facebook accolades and other public claims of friendship and statements that he shaped and changed lives and careers. Just a guy who did the best he could with what he had. Every day. And he did very, very well to be the best person he could be. 
Richard Seavey was a profoundly private person. In his 49 years, he walked through more than his share of trials and tribulations, mostly asking for no help, leaning on no one. 

Richard was a fantastic lawyer. He could try a case. He could "litigate" a case. He could mediate and settle a case. He was nuanced. He bent but never broke. The blustery Miami lawyer never scared him. To the contrary, he found humor in it, studying it like a science project. Richard never got too high or too low. He was good at lawyering, but you got the f…

First Carnival Triumph Lawsuit on File!

It was filed in the SD FL (of course) and is pending before Judge Graham.

Check it out here.

The lawyer on the pleading is Marcus R. Spagnoletti.