Skip to main content

3d DCA Watch -- I Know Why the Caged Bunker Sings Edition.



Yes so Maya Angelou is dead -- RIP great lady, and thank you for enriching our lives so, by your art and by your example.

Now let's see what profoundly moving art our Resplendently Robed denizens created this week:

Oh dear trial judge -- you entered an order dismissing a claim with prejudice, but you accidentally forgot something -- any reasoning or explanation of any kind:
The order fails to set forth any factual or legal basis for its dismissal with prejudice, and this Court has no way of determining whether the dismissal with prejudice is premised, for example, on Appellant’s non-compliance with a prior order; a failure to state a claim (or failure to amend to state a claim); an abuse of the judicial process; or some other basis that might support the trial court’s exercise of its discretion. Further, the order itself indicates that the hearing was set only for the purpose of addressing Appellant’s motion for rehearing. There is nothing in the record below to suggest that Appellant was placed on notice that the trial court would also consider dismissal of the complaint at this hearing, muchless a dismissal with prejudice. Rudimentary notions of due process require that we reverse that portion of the order dismissing the action with prejudice, with directions to reinstate the action.
But that was Judge Emas in partial dissent -- turns out what the Judge did was perfectly proper!

Want to know why?

Ok, here you go:
PER CURIAM.
 

Affirmed.
So that should clear things up.

Redwood Recovery v. Addle Hill:

"And she stepped on the Venetian Salami."

Have a good day all!


Comments

  1. You sir are also an artist. Well done.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wisdom and grace are such a rare combination. RIP Maya.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nothing about the Connolly opinion and Exhibit 546 why Judge Rothenberg is the worst judge in Florida?

    ReplyDelete
  4. 12:22- Agreed. :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. I remain of the view that ``Per curium, affirmed'' is latin for ``We really must get moving if we wish to make our tee time.''

    Otherwise, they ought to be able to spare a couple of sentences to say why the appellant's argument is wrong. Or that the appellant failed to furnish some essential part of the record, making review impossible. Or even just that you do not like the appellant, or that your fondness for the banks makes it impossible to support a ruling against them.

    Mark it ``not for publication'', but go ahead and spend the 5 minutes to justify your filing fee.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Kind of Federal Judge!

Sure we have Scott Rothstein and his lovely Tom James clothier Romina Sifuentes, but Louisiana has ED LA judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr.:
A federal judge from Louisiana who had run up big gambling debts routinely solicited money and gifts from lawyers with cases before his court, Congressional investigators said Tuesday as the House opened impeachment hearings in the judge’s case. The judge, G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Federal District Court, had more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos, investigators said. Judge Porteous’s requests for cash became so frequent that one New Orleans lawyer said he started trying to dodge the judge.“He began to use excuses that he needed it for tuition, he needed it for living expenses,” the lawyer, Robert Creely, told a House Judiciary Committee task force. “I would avoid him until I couldn’t avoid him anymore.”
Mr. Creely said he and his law partner, Jacob Amato, gave Judge Porteous an estimated $20,000 o…

Honoring Richard C. Seavey

I drank a shit-ton of bourbon last night. Enough to float a battleship.

My head hurts. But not as much as my heart.

We lost another lawyer over the weekend. Not someone who will receive facebook accolades and other public claims of friendship and statements that he shaped and changed lives and careers. Just a guy who did the best he could with what he had. Every day. And he did very, very well to be the best person he could be. 
Richard Seavey was a profoundly private person. In his 49 years, he walked through more than his share of trials and tribulations, mostly asking for no help, leaning on no one. 

Richard was a fantastic lawyer. He could try a case. He could "litigate" a case. He could mediate and settle a case. He was nuanced. He bent but never broke. The blustery Miami lawyer never scared him. To the contrary, he found humor in it, studying it like a science project. Richard never got too high or too low. He was good at lawyering, but you got the f…

First Carnival Triumph Lawsuit on File!

It was filed in the SD FL (of course) and is pending before Judge Graham.

Check it out here.

The lawyer on the pleading is Marcus R. Spagnoletti.