Skip to main content

Larry Klayman v. Judicial Watch (Plus Orly Taitz!)


How's that for a hat trick?

Larry Klayman, the controversial attorney and founder of Judicial Watch, is suing his former public interest group over allegedly defamatory statements that somehow also allegedly involve birther attorney Orly Taitz!  (She's not a defendant.)

And it's all in front of sober, serious-minded Judge Altonaga, who granted sj on some claims but did find triable issues.

Grab some popcorn, kids, you'll want to be at this trial!

Comments

  1. Okay...serious scholarly question regarding the following sample from the order:

    Klayman made the strategic decision to be held in contempt to permit him to raise issues on appeal. (See Def.’s SF ¶ 25; Pl.’s SF ¶ 25; Klayman Dep. 43:5–10).

    Does the period at the end of the parenthetical cite to the record go outside (as it is in the order), or inside the parenthetical? (See e.g. bla bla bla.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. The idiots are out!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Fake Internet Know-it-AllMay 30, 2014 at 1:15 PM

    Whatever I say it should be.

    ReplyDelete
  4. To 11:49 -- yes, the period should be inside the parenthetical. But each person has his or her own style, and Judge Altonaga places the periods on the outside.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 2:01 -

    So the answer is that either way is correct?

    Seriously, not trying to knock one of the best judges we have - just want to know - is there a preferred method?

    ReplyDelete
  6. If you're interested in this case, we have been chronicling it at the Fogbow web forum (which mostly focuses on exposing the birther movement) since it was first filed last year. http://www.thefogbow.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=10743

    You won't find any friends of Larry, Orly, or Judicial Watch there, but that thread has the whole story of the case, along with lots of lawyerly analysis done by real lawyers, and links to most of the documents filed.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Happy Friday SFL!!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. 2:36 -- you should place the period on the inside of the mark, which is standard. My point was not to suggest that both are correct (in fact, you won't find any support in any style or usage guide for placing the period on the outside of the parentheses). My point, rather, was to state only that everyone has their own style for doing things.

    That being said, there's no need to use parentheticals for record citations at all. Although the Bluebook permits enclosing record citations within parentheses, the principal way of citing record citations is not to use them. In my view, the less clutter, the better.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Pres. Obama was born in outer space, and his 12 tentacled socialist wife is going to come brainwash yur children in to gay marriage while giving you a Coca-Cola enema.

    ReplyDelete
  10. That is advice I can follow...losing parenthetical cites sounds good to me.

    ReplyDelete
  11. @ 5:00

    I've been to that party. It was a blast!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Periods go outside of parentheses unless the entire system is within parentheses.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Happy Friday/Weekend, SFL.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Kind of Federal Judge!

Sure we have Scott Rothstein and his lovely Tom James clothier Romina Sifuentes, but Louisiana has ED LA judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr.:
A federal judge from Louisiana who had run up big gambling debts routinely solicited money and gifts from lawyers with cases before his court, Congressional investigators said Tuesday as the House opened impeachment hearings in the judge’s case. The judge, G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Federal District Court, had more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos, investigators said. Judge Porteous’s requests for cash became so frequent that one New Orleans lawyer said he started trying to dodge the judge.“He began to use excuses that he needed it for tuition, he needed it for living expenses,” the lawyer, Robert Creely, told a House Judiciary Committee task force. “I would avoid him until I couldn’t avoid him anymore.”
Mr. Creely said he and his law partner, Jacob Amato, gave Judge Porteous an estimated $20,000 o…

Honoring Richard C. Seavey

I drank a shit-ton of bourbon last night. Enough to float a battleship.

My head hurts. But not as much as my heart.

We lost another lawyer over the weekend. Not someone who will receive facebook accolades and other public claims of friendship and statements that he shaped and changed lives and careers. Just a guy who did the best he could with what he had. Every day. And he did very, very well to be the best person he could be. 
Richard Seavey was a profoundly private person. In his 49 years, he walked through more than his share of trials and tribulations, mostly asking for no help, leaning on no one. 

Richard was a fantastic lawyer. He could try a case. He could "litigate" a case. He could mediate and settle a case. He was nuanced. He bent but never broke. The blustery Miami lawyer never scared him. To the contrary, he found humor in it, studying it like a science project. Richard never got too high or too low. He was good at lawyering, but you got the f…

First Carnival Triumph Lawsuit on File!

It was filed in the SD FL (of course) and is pending before Judge Graham.

Check it out here.

The lawyer on the pleading is Marcus R. Spagnoletti.