Skip to main content

3d DCA Watch -- Get Your 57.105 On!


I'm not a big fan of 57.105 motions -- you've already won, the case is dead, and now you want that extra pound of flesh?

Let it go.

And there can certainly be times when something is so frivolous that a motion for fees is appropriate -- but simply winning the case should not qualify.

That's pretty much the situation here:
The fact that the trial court determined, via summary judgment, that Phillips was entitled to qualified immunity, does not necessarily mean that Garcia’s malicious prosecution claim lacked factual support—and was therefore sanctionable—under section 57.105. . . .The record supports the trial court’s conclusion that Phillips did not establish that Garcia’s malicious prosecution claim was meritless; Phillips simply proved that, in this instance, she was able to avoid Garcia’s claim by successfully advancing her immunity defense.
Time to move for rehearing?


Comments

  1. What is good? Japanese finger-foods, Champagne & bubble-bath, followed by a good massage and sex. I'm a lover not a fighter!

    ReplyDelete
  2. This was one of those classy "I'm going to 57.105 you for 57.105'ing me!" cases. [eyeroll].

    I don't see the use of the motion as getting an extra pound of flesh when you win. You're getting your client's fees paid in having to defend against a lawsuit or a motion unsupported by facts and/or application of the law to the facts. I don't think you're properly serving your client's interest by not serving a 57.105 under the appropriate circumstances.

    Obviously there are political concerns when serving one of those, the most common of which is when a large firm 57.105's another large firm, but that another discussion.

    ReplyDelete
  3. They are rarely granted.

    ReplyDelete
  4. why would there be rehearing on a abuse of discretion standard of reiew case. Four judges said no. Isn't that reasonable enough?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I like that scene.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Kind of Federal Judge!

Sure we have Scott Rothstein and his lovely Tom James clothier Romina Sifuentes, but Louisiana has ED LA judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr.:
A federal judge from Louisiana who had run up big gambling debts routinely solicited money and gifts from lawyers with cases before his court, Congressional investigators said Tuesday as the House opened impeachment hearings in the judge’s case. The judge, G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Federal District Court, had more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos, investigators said. Judge Porteous’s requests for cash became so frequent that one New Orleans lawyer said he started trying to dodge the judge.“He began to use excuses that he needed it for tuition, he needed it for living expenses,” the lawyer, Robert Creely, told a House Judiciary Committee task force. “I would avoid him until I couldn’t avoid him anymore.”
Mr. Creely said he and his law partner, Jacob Amato, gave Judge Porteous an estimated $20,000 o…

Honoring Richard C. Seavey

I drank a shit-ton of bourbon last night. Enough to float a battleship.

My head hurts. But not as much as my heart.

We lost another lawyer over the weekend. Not someone who will receive facebook accolades and other public claims of friendship and statements that he shaped and changed lives and careers. Just a guy who did the best he could with what he had. Every day. And he did very, very well to be the best person he could be. 
Richard Seavey was a profoundly private person. In his 49 years, he walked through more than his share of trials and tribulations, mostly asking for no help, leaning on no one. 

Richard was a fantastic lawyer. He could try a case. He could "litigate" a case. He could mediate and settle a case. He was nuanced. He bent but never broke. The blustery Miami lawyer never scared him. To the contrary, he found humor in it, studying it like a science project. Richard never got too high or too low. He was good at lawyering, but you got the f…

First Carnival Triumph Lawsuit on File!

It was filed in the SD FL (of course) and is pending before Judge Graham.

Check it out here.

The lawyer on the pleading is Marcus R. Spagnoletti.