Skip to main content

Addicted to Email?

This article on the "tyranny of email" had me thinking this morning:
White-collar cubicle dwellers complain about email for good reason. They spend 28 percent of their workweek slogging through the stuff, according to the McKinsey Global Institute. They check their messages 74 times a day, on average, according to Gloria Mark, an authority on workplace behavior and a professor at the University of California, Irvine.
And lots of that checking happens at home. Jennifer Deal, a senior research scientist at the Center for Creative Leadership, surveyed smartphone-using white-collar workers and found that most were umbilically tied to email a stunning 13.5 hours a day, well into the evening. Workers don’t even take a break during dinner — where, other research shows, fully 38 percent check work email “routinely,” peeking at the phone under the table. Half check it in bed in the morning. What agonizes workers is the expectation that they’ll reply instantly to a colleague or boss, no matter how ungodly the hour. Hence the endless, neurotic checking, and the dread of getting in trouble for ignoring something.
Surely lawyers with an active practice far exceed these numbers.

I'm not proud of this, but given exchanges with co-workers, colleagues, opposing counsel, email orders and motions etc., editing of documents and you name it, I check my email probably every three to four minutes from waking to bedtime.

That doesn't include social media, texting, and other smartphone functions (including the occasional phone call).

Perhaps that's one reason you don't hear lawyer-parents calling for their kids to get off the phone anymore -- they are on it more than their children!

What is the solution?

I don't think the one offered by the author of that NYT piece works -- you simply can't, in a modern practice, "shut down" emails after, say 6 p.m.  You'd be totally out of the loop on many useless and meaningless conversations and notifications (but it's the possibility that something important happened that keeps you coming back).

Or can you?

What are the creative solutions?

"Breaks" during the day; mindfulness time outs, being disciplined enough to put the phone down for an hour or two?

What are your thoughts?   (No one is really working today anyways.) 

Comments

  1. Happy Long Weekend, SFL. Have fun windsurfing!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh & don't forget, "Bolero"

    :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. One Gibson per email read.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have witnessed people, attorneys, checking their email while on vacation. I'm shocked I tell you, shocked!

    ReplyDelete

  5. Happy Labor Day, SFL.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Little late to the party here- don't check blogs but once or twice a week.

    I check e-mail about every 30-45 minutes, log in and out after checking.
    It doesn't stay open in browser all day long.
    Nothing is going to be that impt that I need to see it every few minutes.
    When I leave office at 7:30 or so I log out and don't check back in until I get here next morning.
    Obvious exceptions during trials or if anticipating last minute filings, etc but if something is on fire, someone will call me and not send an e-mail.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Kind of Federal Judge!

Sure we have Scott Rothstein and his lovely Tom James clothier Romina Sifuentes, but Louisiana has ED LA judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr.:
A federal judge from Louisiana who had run up big gambling debts routinely solicited money and gifts from lawyers with cases before his court, Congressional investigators said Tuesday as the House opened impeachment hearings in the judge’s case. The judge, G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Federal District Court, had more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos, investigators said. Judge Porteous’s requests for cash became so frequent that one New Orleans lawyer said he started trying to dodge the judge.“He began to use excuses that he needed it for tuition, he needed it for living expenses,” the lawyer, Robert Creely, told a House Judiciary Committee task force. “I would avoid him until I couldn’t avoid him anymore.”
Mr. Creely said he and his law partner, Jacob Amato, gave Judge Porteous an estimated $20,000 o…

Honoring Richard C. Seavey

I drank a shit-ton of bourbon last night. Enough to float a battleship.

My head hurts. But not as much as my heart.

We lost another lawyer over the weekend. Not someone who will receive facebook accolades and other public claims of friendship and statements that he shaped and changed lives and careers. Just a guy who did the best he could with what he had. Every day. And he did very, very well to be the best person he could be. 
Richard Seavey was a profoundly private person. In his 49 years, he walked through more than his share of trials and tribulations, mostly asking for no help, leaning on no one. 

Richard was a fantastic lawyer. He could try a case. He could "litigate" a case. He could mediate and settle a case. He was nuanced. He bent but never broke. The blustery Miami lawyer never scared him. To the contrary, he found humor in it, studying it like a science project. Richard never got too high or too low. He was good at lawyering, but you got the f…

First Carnival Triumph Lawsuit on File!

It was filed in the SD FL (of course) and is pending before Judge Graham.

Check it out here.

The lawyer on the pleading is Marcus R. Spagnoletti.