Skip to main content

Since The Day Has Already Gone To Pot...


This excellent editorial addresses one of the issues brought up in the previous thread.
In a column printed Wednesday in the Tampa Bay Times, seven former justices rehashed arguments that opponents previously lost in court: "Voters are led to believe that medical marijuana could only be used for 'debilitating diseases.' But the full text of the amendment allows the use of marijuana for virtually any medical condition at the discretion of any recommending physician, and no actual prescription is required." 
That argument failed and the court decided to "reject the opponents' construction of the proposed amendment" and said: "Rather than allow the open-ended, broad use of marijuana, these multiple restrictions in the text of the amendment itself reflect a constitutional scheme that is meant to be limited in scope regarding the medical use of marijuana to treat 'debilitating medical conditions.' " 
The court could not be clearer and they were right. If the Supreme Court had believed opponent's argument, the amendment would not be on the ballot. 
The former justices' column goes on to say: "Today the criminal and civil justice systems protect citizens from harmful acts and compensate victims and families in cases of medical malpractice and negligence. But under Amendment 2, those providing medical marijuana, including every 'certifying physician,' would be immune from basic enforcement and accountability that protect our safety." 
That statement again represents the opinion of the opponents that was rejected by the Florida Supreme Court: "As the proponent states, in order to enable physicians to consider medical marijuana and certify its use, it is necessary to prevent them from being punished for the limited act of recommending marijuana under the terms of the amendment. That is all the amendment does. … The amendment does not change liability for negligence, fraud or misconduct." 
Again, the court could not be clearer that the amendment does not change liability for wrongful actions. To say otherwise is misleading.
Read it all here.  

Popular posts from this blog

My Kind of Federal Judge!

Sure we have Scott Rothstein and his lovely Tom James clothier Romina Sifuentes, but Louisiana has ED LA judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr.:
A federal judge from Louisiana who had run up big gambling debts routinely solicited money and gifts from lawyers with cases before his court, Congressional investigators said Tuesday as the House opened impeachment hearings in the judge’s case. The judge, G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Federal District Court, had more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos, investigators said. Judge Porteous’s requests for cash became so frequent that one New Orleans lawyer said he started trying to dodge the judge.“He began to use excuses that he needed it for tuition, he needed it for living expenses,” the lawyer, Robert Creely, told a House Judiciary Committee task force. “I would avoid him until I couldn’t avoid him anymore.”
Mr. Creely said he and his law partner, Jacob Amato, gave Judge Porteous an estimated $20,000 o…

Honoring Richard C. Seavey

I drank a shit-ton of bourbon last night. Enough to float a battleship.

My head hurts. But not as much as my heart.

We lost another lawyer over the weekend. Not someone who will receive facebook accolades and other public claims of friendship and statements that he shaped and changed lives and careers. Just a guy who did the best he could with what he had. Every day. And he did very, very well to be the best person he could be. 
Richard Seavey was a profoundly private person. In his 49 years, he walked through more than his share of trials and tribulations, mostly asking for no help, leaning on no one. 

Richard was a fantastic lawyer. He could try a case. He could "litigate" a case. He could mediate and settle a case. He was nuanced. He bent but never broke. The blustery Miami lawyer never scared him. To the contrary, he found humor in it, studying it like a science project. Richard never got too high or too low. He was good at lawyering, but you got the f…

First Carnival Triumph Lawsuit on File!

It was filed in the SD FL (of course) and is pending before Judge Graham.

Check it out here.

The lawyer on the pleading is Marcus R. Spagnoletti.