Skip to main content

3d DCA Watch -- Holy Crap Edition.


I'm not into kicking anyone when they're down, but it is true that this opinion exists and unfortunately it's the only opinion of significance this week.

Boy I'm going to take a break and get some coffee.

Comments

  1. RE: "Holy Crap Edition."

    Gotta love the title!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I wonder if he argued that putting an arbitration clause in an agreement should require the attorneys to advise the client to seek independent counsel?

    Has that been argued? Is there law on that?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Assume it was a non-issue...from 4-1.5:

    Arbitration Clauses. --A lawyer shall not make an agreement with a
    potential client prospectively providing for mandatory arbitration of fee
    disputes without first advising that person in writing that the potential
    client should consider obtaining independent legal advice as to the
    advisability of entering into an agreement containing such mandatory
    arbitration provisions. A lawyer shall not make an agreement containing such
    mandatory arbitration provisions unless the agreement contains the following
    language in bold print:




    NOTICE: This agreement contains provisions requiring arbitration of fee
    disputes. Before you sign this agreement you should consider consulting
    with another lawyer about the advisability of making an agreement with
    mandatory arbitration requirements. Arbitration proceedings are ways to
    resolve disputes without use of the court system. By entering into
    agreements that require arbitration as the way to resolve fee disputes,
    you give up (waive) your right to go to court to resolve those disputes
    by a judge or jury. These are important rights that should not be given
    up without careful consideration.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Was that language in this agreement?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Don't know, but I am sure Rothenberg, being the ethical enforcer concurror extraordinaire, would have thrown the clause out if it wasn't.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Can I get a PETITION FOR REHEARING!!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. The video of the oral argument is interesting, and it wasn't just Rothenberg who went after him. It's easy to find in the "Archived Video Oral Arguments" section of the Third DCA website. Search term "Nordt."

    ReplyDelete
  8. Having now watched the video of the oral argument, I think the opinion by Judge Rothenberg is over the top.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Kind of Federal Judge!

Sure we have Scott Rothstein and his lovely Tom James clothier Romina Sifuentes, but Louisiana has ED LA judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr.:
A federal judge from Louisiana who had run up big gambling debts routinely solicited money and gifts from lawyers with cases before his court, Congressional investigators said Tuesday as the House opened impeachment hearings in the judge’s case. The judge, G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Federal District Court, had more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos, investigators said. Judge Porteous’s requests for cash became so frequent that one New Orleans lawyer said he started trying to dodge the judge.“He began to use excuses that he needed it for tuition, he needed it for living expenses,” the lawyer, Robert Creely, told a House Judiciary Committee task force. “I would avoid him until I couldn’t avoid him anymore.”
Mr. Creely said he and his law partner, Jacob Amato, gave Judge Porteous an estimated $20,000 o…

Honoring Richard C. Seavey

I drank a shit-ton of bourbon last night. Enough to float a battleship.

My head hurts. But not as much as my heart.

We lost another lawyer over the weekend. Not someone who will receive facebook accolades and other public claims of friendship and statements that he shaped and changed lives and careers. Just a guy who did the best he could with what he had. Every day. And he did very, very well to be the best person he could be. 
Richard Seavey was a profoundly private person. In his 49 years, he walked through more than his share of trials and tribulations, mostly asking for no help, leaning on no one. 

Richard was a fantastic lawyer. He could try a case. He could "litigate" a case. He could mediate and settle a case. He was nuanced. He bent but never broke. The blustery Miami lawyer never scared him. To the contrary, he found humor in it, studying it like a science project. Richard never got too high or too low. He was good at lawyering, but you got the f…

First Carnival Triumph Lawsuit on File!

It was filed in the SD FL (of course) and is pending before Judge Graham.

Check it out here.

The lawyer on the pleading is Marcus R. Spagnoletti.