Skip to main content

Hate, Spite, and Temper Tantrums

Hate, spite, and temper tantrums; that's the only way to describe the reaction of hard right social conservatives to the wave of LGBT equality that is sweeping the nation. Rather than saying, "OK, we lost, maybe we were wrong," they are twisting themselves into pretzels trying to find new and inventive ways to be discriminatory and spiteful. It's nothing but pure hate.

Let's be clear, we won. We are winning both in the courts and in the arena of public opinion. This isn't a case of activist judges rejecting the will of the majority. If anything, the judiciary is behind the curve of public opinion where recent polling shows support for same-sex marriage now at 60% nationally, and even higher in states (now at 36) that already have marriage equality. Even a majority of Republican primary voters in New Hampshire and South Carolina said opposing gay marriage is either mostly or totally unacceptable.

If you've lost South Carolina Republicans, you've lost. But that hasn't stopped the nonsense.

Let's review.

In Kansas Governor Brownback took time off from destroying his state's economy with Tea Party economics to sign an executive order eliminating employment protections for LGBT workers.

In Arkansas the legislature passed a bill that would prohibit any local municipalities from enacting laws to protect LGBT rights.

In Oklahoma where some lawmakers believe gay marriage is a bigger threat than terrorism, they have drafted a bill that would demand the firing of clerks who follow court rulings and issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

A State Supreme Court Justice in Alabama is threatening to end all marriages if same-sex marriages are allowed.

And in Georgia, Arizona, Virginia, and even places like liberal Washington State, efforts are underway to allow businesses to discriminate against homosexuals for religious reasons.

This list is by no means comprehensive and I certainly don't think the worst of it will survive constitutional scrutiny. But it clearly illustrates that hate, not reason is the driving motivation of gay rights opponents and, on the upside, it will provide a lot of work for attorneys (and blogging material for me) long after the expected victory for marriage equality this coming June.

Gay is the new black.


  1. Glad you like it Princess! It fits too. What have we done? You don't see gays trying to ban Christian marriage.

  2. So if public opinion is truly behind it, why not effect change at the ballot box as opposed to the courts? Then the other side can accept a fair, democratic loss.

  3. Because justice delayed is justice denied. Duh.

  4. You think the courts are faster? In response to the hawaii Supreme Court decision, people passed laws within a year going the other way. How long has the litigation been going on, and it is still not even close to done. The supreme court will just be the beginning of broader issue. I don't think you are being honest with yourself.

  5. We will have marriage equality from coast to coast in time for my 4th of July Party. #honestly

    Now go play in traffic troll. :-9

  6. Why is someone a troll just because they disagree with you? You seem pretty intolerant.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Kind of Federal Judge!

Sure we have Scott Rothstein and his lovely Tom James clothier Romina Sifuentes, but Louisiana has ED LA judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr.:
A federal judge from Louisiana who had run up big gambling debts routinely solicited money and gifts from lawyers with cases before his court, Congressional investigators said Tuesday as the House opened impeachment hearings in the judge’s case. The judge, G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Federal District Court, had more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos, investigators said. Judge Porteous’s requests for cash became so frequent that one New Orleans lawyer said he started trying to dodge the judge.“He began to use excuses that he needed it for tuition, he needed it for living expenses,” the lawyer, Robert Creely, told a House Judiciary Committee task force. “I would avoid him until I couldn’t avoid him anymore.”
Mr. Creely said he and his law partner, Jacob Amato, gave Judge Porteous an estimated $20,000 o…

Honoring Richard C. Seavey

I drank a shit-ton of bourbon last night. Enough to float a battleship.

My head hurts. But not as much as my heart.

We lost another lawyer over the weekend. Not someone who will receive facebook accolades and other public claims of friendship and statements that he shaped and changed lives and careers. Just a guy who did the best he could with what he had. Every day. And he did very, very well to be the best person he could be. 
Richard Seavey was a profoundly private person. In his 49 years, he walked through more than his share of trials and tribulations, mostly asking for no help, leaning on no one. 

Richard was a fantastic lawyer. He could try a case. He could "litigate" a case. He could mediate and settle a case. He was nuanced. He bent but never broke. The blustery Miami lawyer never scared him. To the contrary, he found humor in it, studying it like a science project. Richard never got too high or too low. He was good at lawyering, but you got the f…

First Carnival Triumph Lawsuit on File!

It was filed in the SD FL (of course) and is pending before Judge Graham.

Check it out here.

The lawyer on the pleading is Marcus R. Spagnoletti.