Skip to main content

Now Your Death Penalty Brief Can Be Longer -- Won't Your Client Will Be Thrilled?


So you may have heard that the US Supreme Court is taking a look at how we execute people:
The Supreme Court agreed Monday to review whether Florida’s capital punishment system too easily allows juries to recommend the execution of criminals.

Florida permits executions based on divided jury votes and doesn’t require a jury to make specific findings regarding the aggravating factors that can justify death. The high court is to decide whether those practices violate of the U.S. Constitution. Alabama is the only other state that allows a divided jury vote for the death penalty.
Wow -- us and Alabama -- great company to be in! 


But no worries -- the Florida Supremes have instituted important structural protections, so back off you DC Big-Gov meddlers:
It has been the Court’s longstanding practice to permit the appellate briefs filed in certain cases relating to the imposition of a sentence of death to exceed the standard page limits set out in rule 9.210. However, this practice, which is specific to the Court’s death penalty cases, has been implemented through the issuance of standard Court orders on a case-by-case basis, rather than as a codified practice set forth in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

New subdivision (a)(6), which we add to rule 9.210, formalizes the Court’s practice of permitting longer appellate briefs in certain cases relating to the imposition of a sentence of death.
Ok underpaid or pro bono long-suffering death penalty litigators -- your five extra pages is assured (but make 'em count)!

Sheesh, why did I wake up all pissed off this morning -- it's Friday:



Comments

  1. The confederacy, still up to their old trck. You lost bitches, give it up.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Kind of Federal Judge!

Sure we have Scott Rothstein and his lovely Tom James clothier Romina Sifuentes, but Louisiana has ED LA judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr.:
A federal judge from Louisiana who had run up big gambling debts routinely solicited money and gifts from lawyers with cases before his court, Congressional investigators said Tuesday as the House opened impeachment hearings in the judge’s case. The judge, G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Federal District Court, had more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos, investigators said. Judge Porteous’s requests for cash became so frequent that one New Orleans lawyer said he started trying to dodge the judge.“He began to use excuses that he needed it for tuition, he needed it for living expenses,” the lawyer, Robert Creely, told a House Judiciary Committee task force. “I would avoid him until I couldn’t avoid him anymore.”
Mr. Creely said he and his law partner, Jacob Amato, gave Judge Porteous an estimated $20,000 o…

Honoring Richard C. Seavey

I drank a shit-ton of bourbon last night. Enough to float a battleship.

My head hurts. But not as much as my heart.

We lost another lawyer over the weekend. Not someone who will receive facebook accolades and other public claims of friendship and statements that he shaped and changed lives and careers. Just a guy who did the best he could with what he had. Every day. And he did very, very well to be the best person he could be. 
Richard Seavey was a profoundly private person. In his 49 years, he walked through more than his share of trials and tribulations, mostly asking for no help, leaning on no one. 

Richard was a fantastic lawyer. He could try a case. He could "litigate" a case. He could mediate and settle a case. He was nuanced. He bent but never broke. The blustery Miami lawyer never scared him. To the contrary, he found humor in it, studying it like a science project. Richard never got too high or too low. He was good at lawyering, but you got the f…

First Carnival Triumph Lawsuit on File!

It was filed in the SD FL (of course) and is pending before Judge Graham.

Check it out here.

The lawyer on the pleading is Marcus R. Spagnoletti.