Skip to main content

Twenty-Nine Pages on Whether You Can Cancel a Mediation!

But first that holiday tradition -- the four questions:

(1) Why on this blog do we like this Magistrate Judge so much where on other blogs they don't write about him that often?

(2) Why is it cooler to quote rock lyrics and old movie lines where other judges merely quote boring controlling authority?

(3) Why not explicate everything so much to the nth degree when other judges don't always do that?

(4) Why on all other blogs do we recline when reading but on this blog we use our hip new standing desk?

Oh well let's just get into it:
Does a plaintiff violate some type of purported requirement to mediate in “good faith” when it fails to respond to a defense request for a current settlement demand before scheduling a court‐ordered mediation? If it does, then should it cause a court to cancel a mediation? And even if the failure to respond does not equate to bad faith or a lack of good faith, should the Undersigned use it as a ground to cancel the Court ordered mediation, on the basis that mediation would be a waste of time? These are the basic questions generated by Defendant’s Motion for an Order Canceling the Mediation.
So many questions, so little time many answers.

Settle in kids, but here's a taste:
Neither the local rules nor this Court’s mediation requirement (in the trial scheduling order [ECF No. 655]) requires parties to mediate “in good faith.” Although the applicable order and local rule require parties and representatives with full settlement authority to attend the mediation, there is no specific requirement in this case that the parties mediate in good faith, nor is there an express sanction provided for mediating “in bad faith” or for failing to mediate in good faith.
See you next Sukkot!

BTW Judge -- great way to end to end this order!


  1. dude takes his job seriously, works hard, likes to write, does his own research, his legal opinions better reasoned than the memos of law submitted by the high priced lawyers on both sides. i still use his 30(B)(6) opinion, sheesh there is no reason to ever research that bad boy ever again.

  2. I like Goodman because he actually tries, is engaged, and at least appears to care. Which is more than one could say about some of the other judges on our federal bench. Now if only he would cut back on his verbosity.

  3. Why on this blog do we like this Magistrate Judge so much where on other blogs they don't write about him that often?
    -because he's interesting, i don't know


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Kind of Federal Judge!

Sure we have Scott Rothstein and his lovely Tom James clothier Romina Sifuentes, but Louisiana has ED LA judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr.:
A federal judge from Louisiana who had run up big gambling debts routinely solicited money and gifts from lawyers with cases before his court, Congressional investigators said Tuesday as the House opened impeachment hearings in the judge’s case. The judge, G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Federal District Court, had more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos, investigators said. Judge Porteous’s requests for cash became so frequent that one New Orleans lawyer said he started trying to dodge the judge.“He began to use excuses that he needed it for tuition, he needed it for living expenses,” the lawyer, Robert Creely, told a House Judiciary Committee task force. “I would avoid him until I couldn’t avoid him anymore.”
Mr. Creely said he and his law partner, Jacob Amato, gave Judge Porteous an estimated $20,000 o…

Honoring Richard C. Seavey

I drank a shit-ton of bourbon last night. Enough to float a battleship.

My head hurts. But not as much as my heart.

We lost another lawyer over the weekend. Not someone who will receive facebook accolades and other public claims of friendship and statements that he shaped and changed lives and careers. Just a guy who did the best he could with what he had. Every day. And he did very, very well to be the best person he could be. 
Richard Seavey was a profoundly private person. In his 49 years, he walked through more than his share of trials and tribulations, mostly asking for no help, leaning on no one. 

Richard was a fantastic lawyer. He could try a case. He could "litigate" a case. He could mediate and settle a case. He was nuanced. He bent but never broke. The blustery Miami lawyer never scared him. To the contrary, he found humor in it, studying it like a science project. Richard never got too high or too low. He was good at lawyering, but you got the f…

First Carnival Triumph Lawsuit on File!

It was filed in the SD FL (of course) and is pending before Judge Graham.

Check it out here.

The lawyer on the pleading is Marcus R. Spagnoletti.