Skip to main content

3d DCA Watch -- The Tricks of Modern Times Edition!


I've got no use for the tricks of modern times
They tangle all my thoughts like ivy


Al Stewart, Modern Times

Alright, let's do this:

First let's give a warm welcome to our new Chief Judge Suarez!  He's now in charge of all administrative matters:
Judge Richard J. Suarez became the sixteenth chief judge of the Third District Court of Appeal since the court opened in 1957. His term is for two years and, as chief judge, he will be responsible for all administrative matters in the court.
For example:

Should the free coffee in the attorney's lounge be warm, or merely lukewarm?

Should we once again try to repair the old Thighmaster in the mechanical room/gym, or bite the bullet and go on Ebay?

How tightly should we bolt the judicial sinks and toilets this week?

These are important administrative matters!

Oh I kid, congrats Judge!

Onward:

Smith v. Reverse Mortgage:

Judges Scales and Shepherd disagree over whether to toss an old lady out of her home:
SHEPHERD, J., dissenting.
The labor expended by the majority to keep Kenneth Smith’s widow in her home is admirable. Unfortunately, the legal analysis used does not measure up.  For this reason, I respectfully dissent.
Boo hoo!
By its decision today, the majority imposes its own collectivistic view of life planning on a cadre of seniors who have demonstrated they are capable of amassing wealth and governing their own affairs. We should allow the citizenry to be their own deciders.
Agree:  let that poor old widow be the Decider-in-Chief!

Barnsdale v. PHH:

Judge Shepherd again:
I concur in the unelaborated, per curiam affirmance of this appeal, and write only to state that I would also issue an order to Thomas Erskine Ice, counsel of record for the appellant, Barnsdale Holdings, LLC, to show cause why he should not be sanctioned pursuant to 57.105(1)(b) of the Florida Statutes for maintaining a frivolous appeal in this case.1 This court has defined an appeal to be frivolous when “it presents no justiciable question and is so devoid of merit on the face of the record that there is little prospect it will ever succeed.” Visoly v. Sec. Pac. Credit Corp., 768 So. 2d 482, 490-91 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). The appeal prosecuted by Thomas Erskine Ice in this case meets the definition.
My work here is done!

Comments

  1. Shepherd opining on social policy. Yuck.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Did you see the first footnote of Shepherd's concurrence? He says he'd issue the order to show cause only as to Ice (but not as to the associate who signed the appellate briefs and argued the appeal). Although I assume that he did that to save the associate, that's really strange, since Shepherd couldn't have discerned who was at fault for filing a frivolous appeal and blaming Ice over the associate doesn't appear to have any reasoned basis. If you're going to make an example out of someone, I kind of think you have to do it for the signer (or signers) of the appellate papers.

    ReplyDelete
  3. SD Fla, good to have you back. You see this recent decision from a Mag in the 9th Circuit? http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/14/ncaa-athletepay-fees-idUSL2N0ZU1CQ20150714 Looks like you need to get J. Goodman up to speed on Game of Thrones

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Honorable Magistrate Judge Chris McAliley hereby decrees from on high that thou shouldst not--est refer to the Robed Ones as "Mags" lest-eth you appear disrespectful to the legal acumen and general superiority of the Noble Ones.

    Let it be So Decreed this fifteenth day of July in the year two thousand and fifteen.

    So say I all.


    ReplyDelete
  5. Great decision 2:06, though I'm thinking someone may have to explain the GoT reference to Michael.

    Don't know if Magistrate Judge McAliley actually thinks that 3:46, but if so I agree with her -- they are Magistrate Judges under the rules and related statutes so no reason to not give them the respect earned by the title, even for retired toe-tappers.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Great video thank you SFL!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Shepherd channeling his inner Schwartz.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Kind of Federal Judge!

Sure we have Scott Rothstein and his lovely Tom James clothier Romina Sifuentes, but Louisiana has ED LA judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr.:
A federal judge from Louisiana who had run up big gambling debts routinely solicited money and gifts from lawyers with cases before his court, Congressional investigators said Tuesday as the House opened impeachment hearings in the judge’s case. The judge, G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Federal District Court, had more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos, investigators said. Judge Porteous’s requests for cash became so frequent that one New Orleans lawyer said he started trying to dodge the judge.“He began to use excuses that he needed it for tuition, he needed it for living expenses,” the lawyer, Robert Creely, told a House Judiciary Committee task force. “I would avoid him until I couldn’t avoid him anymore.”
Mr. Creely said he and his law partner, Jacob Amato, gave Judge Porteous an estimated $20,000 o…

Honoring Richard C. Seavey

I drank a shit-ton of bourbon last night. Enough to float a battleship.

My head hurts. But not as much as my heart.

We lost another lawyer over the weekend. Not someone who will receive facebook accolades and other public claims of friendship and statements that he shaped and changed lives and careers. Just a guy who did the best he could with what he had. Every day. And he did very, very well to be the best person he could be. 
Richard Seavey was a profoundly private person. In his 49 years, he walked through more than his share of trials and tribulations, mostly asking for no help, leaning on no one. 

Richard was a fantastic lawyer. He could try a case. He could "litigate" a case. He could mediate and settle a case. He was nuanced. He bent but never broke. The blustery Miami lawyer never scared him. To the contrary, he found humor in it, studying it like a science project. Richard never got too high or too low. He was good at lawyering, but you got the f…

First Carnival Triumph Lawsuit on File!

It was filed in the SD FL (of course) and is pending before Judge Graham.

Check it out here.

The lawyer on the pleading is Marcus R. Spagnoletti.