Skip to main content

Stop the Nonsense!


Recent polls have shown a dip in support for same sex marriage following the Obergefell decision and no wonder. Fire and brimstone hysteria has run amok! The lies coming out about what the ruling means have been too preposterous to even give credence with comment, most centering around the idea that my civil marriage is somehow going to lead to the persecution of clergy.

Cue this nonsense.
In the aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court decision on gay marriage, here come conservative Florida legislators to propose a “Pastor Protection Act.” They say it’s needed to reassure nervous religious communities that they won’t be forced to perform marriage ceremonies that violate their principles.
State Rep. Scott Plakon, a Republican from Longwood, near Orlando, is collaborating with the Rev. Chris Walker, pastor of the Cathedral of Power International Church and the author of an online petition that has gathered more than 22,000 signatures.
And today, another Christian group is holding a news conference in Miami to urge Gov. Rick Scott and Republican legislative leaders to pass a measure meant to protect the tax-exempt status of churches that refuse to perform same-sex marriages. The Christian Family Coalition said in a news release that it wants a “Clergy and Religious Institutions Tax-Exempt Protection Act.”
Rev. Walker says in his petition that he seeks a law similar to those in Texas and Oklahoma stating “that no licensed, ordained or authorized official of a religious organization can be required to solemnize or recognize a marriage that violates that official’s conscience or religious belief.”
But all this is already protected by a little something known as the First Amendment.
It’s important to keep in mind that what the Supreme Court ruled on was civil marriage — not the religious marriage rite held in churches and synagogues, and presided over by clergy. The two, though often imagined as being intertwined and inseparable, are very different things.
One is a contract between individuals that holds implications for property, taxes, health benefits and many other worldly concerns. The other has to do with the union of souls and the sanction of God, however the deity is recognized by a specific religion. The distinction is perhaps clearer with divorce. We are all familiar with churches, or rabbinical councils, that won’t recognize a civil divorce for religious reasons.
The court’s ruling was about civil rights. That is, civil marriage. As Justice Anthony Kennedy framed the issue, in writing the 5-4 majority opinion in the gay-marriage case, the plaintiffs were seeking “equal dignity in the eyes of the law.” Nothing in the decision intrudes upon the traditions of a church, synagogue, temple or mosque.
The opinion expressly states that “it must be emphasized that religions, and those who adhere to religious doctrines, may continue to advocate with utmost, sincere conviction that, by divine precepts, same-sex marriage should not be condoned. The First Amendment ensures [it].”
Did we all get that? Good. Now if these turds really want to know what it is to be oppressed they should try being atheists. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Kind of Federal Judge!

Sure we have Scott Rothstein and his lovely Tom James clothier Romina Sifuentes, but Louisiana has ED LA judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr.:
A federal judge from Louisiana who had run up big gambling debts routinely solicited money and gifts from lawyers with cases before his court, Congressional investigators said Tuesday as the House opened impeachment hearings in the judge’s case. The judge, G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Federal District Court, had more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos, investigators said. Judge Porteous’s requests for cash became so frequent that one New Orleans lawyer said he started trying to dodge the judge.“He began to use excuses that he needed it for tuition, he needed it for living expenses,” the lawyer, Robert Creely, told a House Judiciary Committee task force. “I would avoid him until I couldn’t avoid him anymore.”
Mr. Creely said he and his law partner, Jacob Amato, gave Judge Porteous an estimated $20,000 o…

Honoring Richard C. Seavey

I drank a shit-ton of bourbon last night. Enough to float a battleship.

My head hurts. But not as much as my heart.

We lost another lawyer over the weekend. Not someone who will receive facebook accolades and other public claims of friendship and statements that he shaped and changed lives and careers. Just a guy who did the best he could with what he had. Every day. And he did very, very well to be the best person he could be. 
Richard Seavey was a profoundly private person. In his 49 years, he walked through more than his share of trials and tribulations, mostly asking for no help, leaning on no one. 

Richard was a fantastic lawyer. He could try a case. He could "litigate" a case. He could mediate and settle a case. He was nuanced. He bent but never broke. The blustery Miami lawyer never scared him. To the contrary, he found humor in it, studying it like a science project. Richard never got too high or too low. He was good at lawyering, but you got the f…

First Carnival Triumph Lawsuit on File!

It was filed in the SD FL (of course) and is pending before Judge Graham.

Check it out here.

The lawyer on the pleading is Marcus R. Spagnoletti.