Skip to main content

How to Prove the Crime/Fraud Exception Without Proving Your Entire Case?

Short answer:  there really is no good way to do that, and you run the risk of ticking off the presiding Magistrate Judge in the process:
As the Undersigned noted in the Order requiring additional briefing [ECF No. 201], the core of Plaintiffs’ argument for the crime‐fraud exception mirrors their substantive claims in this lawsuit; specifically, that Shire engaged in anti‐competitive behavior to maintain its monopoly over prices of certain prescription drugs. Thus, the ultimate determination as to whether the crime‐fraud exception should apply seemingly requires the resolution of some of the very same factual and legal issues that have not yet been decided by a jury and/or the presiding District Court judge.

While it is true that there is a different standard of proof required for the application of the crime‐fraud exception than the standard used to establish liability under the Sherman Act (i.e., Plaintiffs need now to present only prima facie evidence of the crime or fraud in this circumstance, at which point the burden shifts to Shire to rebut the showing by a preponderance of the evidence), the parties’ efforts to persuade the Court to adopt their view of the crime‐fraud exception here have essentially caused this discovery dispute to morph into what amounts to a “trial on the papers.”
That doesn't sound like a good thing, or does it?
How does it feel
To be the only one?
How does it feel
To be the only one that knows that you're right?
 Have a good weekend!


  1. Happy Friday the 13th, SFL.

    Your #1 Fan

  2. Happy Freddie Kruger Day SFL!!!!!

  3. Freddie Krueger Day is actually September 13th.

    Did you perhaps mean Jason from Camp Crystal(Fri the 13th)?


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Kind of Federal Judge!

Sure we have Scott Rothstein and his lovely Tom James clothier Romina Sifuentes, but Louisiana has ED LA judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr.:
A federal judge from Louisiana who had run up big gambling debts routinely solicited money and gifts from lawyers with cases before his court, Congressional investigators said Tuesday as the House opened impeachment hearings in the judge’s case. The judge, G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Federal District Court, had more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos, investigators said. Judge Porteous’s requests for cash became so frequent that one New Orleans lawyer said he started trying to dodge the judge.“He began to use excuses that he needed it for tuition, he needed it for living expenses,” the lawyer, Robert Creely, told a House Judiciary Committee task force. “I would avoid him until I couldn’t avoid him anymore.”
Mr. Creely said he and his law partner, Jacob Amato, gave Judge Porteous an estimated $20,000 o…

Honoring Richard C. Seavey

I drank a shit-ton of bourbon last night. Enough to float a battleship.

My head hurts. But not as much as my heart.

We lost another lawyer over the weekend. Not someone who will receive facebook accolades and other public claims of friendship and statements that he shaped and changed lives and careers. Just a guy who did the best he could with what he had. Every day. And he did very, very well to be the best person he could be. 
Richard Seavey was a profoundly private person. In his 49 years, he walked through more than his share of trials and tribulations, mostly asking for no help, leaning on no one. 

Richard was a fantastic lawyer. He could try a case. He could "litigate" a case. He could mediate and settle a case. He was nuanced. He bent but never broke. The blustery Miami lawyer never scared him. To the contrary, he found humor in it, studying it like a science project. Richard never got too high or too low. He was good at lawyering, but you got the f…

First Carnival Triumph Lawsuit on File!

It was filed in the SD FL (of course) and is pending before Judge Graham.

Check it out here.

The lawyer on the pleading is Marcus R. Spagnoletti.