Skip to main content

Your Puny "Orders" Cannot Shackle Me!


I've been waiting for the revolution, for the call to rise up and unshackle those chains!

It's here, and it's good -- as in Goodman:

The Undersigned is bound only by decisions of the United States Supreme Court and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The decision of a federal district judge is not binding precedent in a different judicial district, the same judicial district ‐ or even upon the same judge in a different case.

Ok, binding is technically true, but prior opinions by the same judge or Court on the same issue should be persuasive and clearly is precedent, but I guess I never thought of the Judge's point quite that way.

Happy Friday!

Comments

  1. I don't know, SFL. Many district-level orders are well done and are persuasive. But many -- because the briefing was shoddy, because they were done quickly, because of different skill or experience levels of the judge and the clerk -- are of fairly poor quality, too. Judge Goodman is correct to have reviewed each of the orders cited and to side with the one he thought was legally correct.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh I totally agree, just liked the way he put it is all.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Uh-oh....someone caught a bout of the Macaliley flu......

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Kind of Federal Judge!

Sure we have Scott Rothstein and his lovely Tom James clothier Romina Sifuentes, but Louisiana has ED LA judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr.:
A federal judge from Louisiana who had run up big gambling debts routinely solicited money and gifts from lawyers with cases before his court, Congressional investigators said Tuesday as the House opened impeachment hearings in the judge’s case. The judge, G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Federal District Court, had more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos, investigators said. Judge Porteous’s requests for cash became so frequent that one New Orleans lawyer said he started trying to dodge the judge.“He began to use excuses that he needed it for tuition, he needed it for living expenses,” the lawyer, Robert Creely, told a House Judiciary Committee task force. “I would avoid him until I couldn’t avoid him anymore.”
Mr. Creely said he and his law partner, Jacob Amato, gave Judge Porteous an estimated $20,000 o…

Honoring Richard C. Seavey

I drank a shit-ton of bourbon last night. Enough to float a battleship.

My head hurts. But not as much as my heart.

We lost another lawyer over the weekend. Not someone who will receive facebook accolades and other public claims of friendship and statements that he shaped and changed lives and careers. Just a guy who did the best he could with what he had. Every day. And he did very, very well to be the best person he could be. 
Richard Seavey was a profoundly private person. In his 49 years, he walked through more than his share of trials and tribulations, mostly asking for no help, leaning on no one. 

Richard was a fantastic lawyer. He could try a case. He could "litigate" a case. He could mediate and settle a case. He was nuanced. He bent but never broke. The blustery Miami lawyer never scared him. To the contrary, he found humor in it, studying it like a science project. Richard never got too high or too low. He was good at lawyering, but you got the f…

First Carnival Triumph Lawsuit on File!

It was filed in the SD FL (of course) and is pending before Judge Graham.

Check it out here.

The lawyer on the pleading is Marcus R. Spagnoletti.