Skip to main content

Here We Go Again With Larding Improper Argument Into Notices of Supplemental Authority!


And nobody is better able to get into the weeds and muck around on this issue than Magistrate Judge Goodman:
Three pages of quotations and Plaintiff’s gloss as to the meaning of this case does not constitute an appropriate “Notice.” Because Plaintiffs’ Notice contains legal argument, it is, for all intents and purposes, more akin to an unauthorized surreply. Consequently, because Plaintiffs’ Notice contains a surfeit of legal arguments, this part of the Notice must be stricken.
Why do lawyers do this?

I can possibly see a mild exception where it is necessary to provide context and help explain why the new case supports a point that would not be otherwise obvious to the Court.

But if that's the case maybe the new authority isn't that great, or your point not very persuasive -- it should pretty much stand on its own.

Either way -- resist the temptation.

Comments

  1. RE: "resist the temptation."


    Tsk, tsk, tsk. I think Oscar Wilde said it best--

    "The only way to get rid of temptation is to yield to it"

    Happy Friday, SFL.

    ReplyDelete
  2. really? nothing about this???

    http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/article78711097.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is it possible to give all potential judicial candidates the Narcissistic Personality Inventory?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Kind of Federal Judge!

Sure we have Scott Rothstein and his lovely Tom James clothier Romina Sifuentes, but Louisiana has ED LA judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr.:
A federal judge from Louisiana who had run up big gambling debts routinely solicited money and gifts from lawyers with cases before his court, Congressional investigators said Tuesday as the House opened impeachment hearings in the judge’s case. The judge, G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Federal District Court, had more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos, investigators said. Judge Porteous’s requests for cash became so frequent that one New Orleans lawyer said he started trying to dodge the judge.“He began to use excuses that he needed it for tuition, he needed it for living expenses,” the lawyer, Robert Creely, told a House Judiciary Committee task force. “I would avoid him until I couldn’t avoid him anymore.”
Mr. Creely said he and his law partner, Jacob Amato, gave Judge Porteous an estimated $20,000 o…

Honoring Richard C. Seavey

I drank a shit-ton of bourbon last night. Enough to float a battleship.

My head hurts. But not as much as my heart.

We lost another lawyer over the weekend. Not someone who will receive facebook accolades and other public claims of friendship and statements that he shaped and changed lives and careers. Just a guy who did the best he could with what he had. Every day. And he did very, very well to be the best person he could be. 
Richard Seavey was a profoundly private person. In his 49 years, he walked through more than his share of trials and tribulations, mostly asking for no help, leaning on no one. 

Richard was a fantastic lawyer. He could try a case. He could "litigate" a case. He could mediate and settle a case. He was nuanced. He bent but never broke. The blustery Miami lawyer never scared him. To the contrary, he found humor in it, studying it like a science project. Richard never got too high or too low. He was good at lawyering, but you got the f…

First Carnival Triumph Lawsuit on File!

It was filed in the SD FL (of course) and is pending before Judge Graham.

Check it out here.

The lawyer on the pleading is Marcus R. Spagnoletti.