Skip to main content

Third DCA Watch -- How Does a Tortious Act, Repeatedly Done, Become Merely an "Effect"?

So let's discuss a hot topic nowadays, buzzing on social media nearly everywhere, and that's the doctrine of a "continuing tort" for purposes of calculating when the statute of limitations begins to run on a claim:
We therefore agree with the trial court’s determination that the continuing tort doctrine is not applicable to Effs’ claim for tortious interference with a business relationship.  Contrary to Effs’ assertion, the tort was not continual in nature merely because Sony Pictures made subsequent distribution payments. These additional distribution payments were merely “harmful effects from an original, completed act.”
But wait!

Judge Rothenberg just said a second ago that it's the tortious "act" that starts the statute, and that the trial judge found the first payment to be that very "act":
 “A continuing tort is ‘established by continual tortious acts, not by continual harmful effects from an original, completed act.’”. . . .  Specifically, the trial court found that Effs’ claim for tortious interference with a business relationship accrued on October 30, 2005, when Sony Pictures was required to make its first distribution payment...

So the first distribution payment was the tortious "act" but the last one was merely a harmful "effect," adding to the damages but nothing more?

Example: I punch you in the face every day for a year.  Under this reasoning only the first punch is the completed tort;  all remaining 364 punches are merely "harmful effects from an original, completed act."

Sheesh, the movie business is crazy!


  1. SFL check out Marty Steinberg's malpractice case.

  2. Forget it Jake, it's Rothenberg.

  3. Rothenberg defense gymnastic gold!


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Kind of Federal Judge!

Sure we have Scott Rothstein and his lovely Tom James clothier Romina Sifuentes, but Louisiana has ED LA judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr.:
A federal judge from Louisiana who had run up big gambling debts routinely solicited money and gifts from lawyers with cases before his court, Congressional investigators said Tuesday as the House opened impeachment hearings in the judge’s case. The judge, G. Thomas Porteous Jr. of Federal District Court, had more than $150,000 in credit card debt by 2000, mostly for cash advances spent in casinos, investigators said. Judge Porteous’s requests for cash became so frequent that one New Orleans lawyer said he started trying to dodge the judge.“He began to use excuses that he needed it for tuition, he needed it for living expenses,” the lawyer, Robert Creely, told a House Judiciary Committee task force. “I would avoid him until I couldn’t avoid him anymore.”
Mr. Creely said he and his law partner, Jacob Amato, gave Judge Porteous an estimated $20,000 o…

Honoring Richard C. Seavey

I drank a shit-ton of bourbon last night. Enough to float a battleship.

My head hurts. But not as much as my heart.

We lost another lawyer over the weekend. Not someone who will receive facebook accolades and other public claims of friendship and statements that he shaped and changed lives and careers. Just a guy who did the best he could with what he had. Every day. And he did very, very well to be the best person he could be. 
Richard Seavey was a profoundly private person. In his 49 years, he walked through more than his share of trials and tribulations, mostly asking for no help, leaning on no one. 

Richard was a fantastic lawyer. He could try a case. He could "litigate" a case. He could mediate and settle a case. He was nuanced. He bent but never broke. The blustery Miami lawyer never scared him. To the contrary, he found humor in it, studying it like a science project. Richard never got too high or too low. He was good at lawyering, but you got the f…

First Carnival Triumph Lawsuit on File!

It was filed in the SD FL (of course) and is pending before Judge Graham.

Check it out here.

The lawyer on the pleading is Marcus R. Spagnoletti.